She didn’t have much in retirement accounts. Between her income and my father’s pension, they had never needed to draw much from them. The balances sat there quietly.

Then she reached the age when the government required her to start taking money out.

None of us caught it.

I want to be clear about who missed it. Not her. Me. I had taken responsibility for the finances, and it had never occurred to me that a retirement withdrawal could be mandatory.

I paid the penalty out of my own pocket. She never knew there had been one.

At the time, the penalty for missing a required minimum distribution was 50% of the amount that should have been withdrawn. Half.

The rules are gentler now. The normal penalty is 25%, and it can fall to 10% when the mistake is corrected within two years. The IRS can also waive the penalty when the shortfall resulted from a reasonable mistake and the person takes steps to fix it.

That is good news if you’re reading this with a sinking feeling.

But I would rather you never need the good news.

Nobody Hands You the Rules

That’s the strange thing about retirement withdrawals. There is no orientation.

You spend thirty or forty years being told to put money into retirement accounts. Then one day you’re expected to understand which money is taxable, which withdrawals affect Social Security, when the government will force money out, and whether taking an extra $10,000 could raise your health insurance costs.

Most people don’t know these rules because nobody has given them a reason to learn them yet.

There is also no single withdrawal order that works for everyone. You may have heard that you should spend taxable savings first, traditional retirement accounts second, and Roth money last. That can be reasonable, but following it automatically can also leave years of low tax brackets unused and produce larger required distributions later.

The right starting point is not memorizing an order.

It is understanding what kind of money you own.

Start With the Reassuring Part

Retirees often assume that every dollar they withdraw will produce a large tax bill. That isn’t necessarily true.

For 2026, the standard deduction is $32,200 for a married couple filing jointly and $16,100 for a single filer. People who are 65 or older receive an additional standard deduction of $1,650 per qualifying married person or $2,050 for an unmarried person.

There is also a temporary senior deduction available from 2025 through 2028. It can provide another $6,000 per eligible person, or $12,000 for a married couple when both spouses qualify. The full deduction is available at modified adjusted gross income of up to $75,000 for a single filer or $150,000 for a married couple filing jointly, then phases out above those amounts.

Put those together, and a married couple who are both at least 65 and qualify for the full senior deduction could have $47,500 of federal deductions in 2026 if they use the standard deduction. A qualifying single filer could have $24,150.

That does not guarantee a zero tax bill. Social Security has its own tax calculation, other income matters, and state rules vary.

But it does mean that you should run the numbers before assuming that taking money from a retirement account will be painfully expensive.

Fear is not a tax strategy.

Your Three Tax Buckets

Most of the money you have saved falls into one of three buckets.

Traditional retirement money

This includes most traditional 401(k), 403(b), SEP-IRA, SIMPLE IRA, and traditional IRA balances.

You generally received a tax benefit when the money went in, and the investments grew without yearly taxes. When the money comes out, the taxable portion is treated as ordinary income.

If you withdraw $10,000, that does not mean you owe $10,000 in tax. It means $10,000 is generally added to the income used to calculate your tax bill.

Roth money

Roth contributions are made with money that has already been taxed.

Qualified Roth withdrawals, including the growth, are generally federal-income-tax-free. They also do not add to adjusted gross income. That makes Roth money particularly useful in years when another taxable withdrawal could affect Social Security taxation, an ACA subsidy, or Medicare premiums.

Already-taxed savings and investments

Money in a checking account or savings account does not become taxable again when you withdraw it. The interest is generally taxed as you earn it.

A taxable brokerage account is more complicated. Selling an investment can create a taxable capital gain or loss, but you are not taxed again on the entire amount you invested. You are generally taxed on the gain.

That can make taxable savings relatively inexpensive to use, but not always. Selling an investment with a large gain may cost more than taking a modest traditional retirement withdrawal in a low tax bracket.

The three buckets are a map. They are not an automatic spending order.

The Gap Years

One of the best planning opportunities may arrive between the year you stop working and the year required minimum distributions begin.

Your paycheck is gone. You may not have claimed Social Security yet. Required withdrawals have not started. For the first time in decades, you may have substantial control over how much taxable income appears on your return.

Most people spend these years trying not to touch their retirement accounts.

That can be a mistake.

Suppose you retire at 64 and leave your traditional 401(k) untouched until required distributions begin. You may preserve the balance, but you may also waste several years when you could have withdrawn some money at relatively low tax rates.

Later, Social Security, pensions, investment income, and required distributions may all arrive together.

There are two ways to use the gap.

You can withdraw traditional money and spend it. Or you can convert some traditional money to Roth, pay the tax now, and leave the converted money invested.

A Roth conversion can be useful, but it is not mandatory. The financial internet often treats conversions as the centerpiece of retirement planning because it is usually writing for households with very large retirement balances.

For many working families, the simpler move is enough: use some traditional retirement money during low-income years instead of treating the account as untouchable until the government forces withdrawals.

Do Not Claim Social Security Just to Avoid the 401(k)

Some people claim Social Security at 62 because they are afraid to withdraw money from a retirement account.

That decision deserves a second look.

Claiming Social Security early generally reduces the monthly benefit. Delaying beyond full retirement age increases the monthly benefit until age 70.

That does not mean everyone should wait until 70. Health, life expectancy, employment, spousal benefits, cash needs, and personal preference all matter.

But using some traditional retirement savings while delaying Social Security can sometimes accomplish two things at once:

• It reduces the traditional balance that will eventually be subject to required distributions.

• It allows the Social Security benefit to grow.

The mistake is not claiming at 62. The mistake is claiming at 62 because you believe touching the 401(k) is automatically worse.

Compare the two choices with real numbers.

Three Income Tripwires

A retirement withdrawal can cost more than its ordinary income tax. These are the three places I would watch most closely.

1. Social Security taxation

Whether Social Security becomes taxable depends on what the government calls combined income, sometimes described as provisional income.

It includes:

• your adjusted gross income,

• tax-exempt interest, and

• half of your Social Security benefits.

For a married couple filing jointly, Social Security taxation begins when combined income exceeds $32,000. Above $44,000, as much as 85% of the benefit may be included in taxable income.

For a single filer, the corresponding thresholds are $25,000 and $34,000.

Two points matter here.

First, this does not mean Social Security is taxed at an 85% rate. It means that up to 85% of the benefit can become part of your taxable income.

Second, this is not a single cliff where one extra dollar suddenly makes 85% of your benefits taxable. The taxable amount grows as income rises. But the interaction can create surprisingly high effective tax rates across certain ranges.

The thresholds have never been adjusted for inflation, so more retirees are gradually being pulled into the calculation.

Tax-exempt municipal bond interest counts in the formula. The new senior deduction does not protect you here because it does not reduce adjusted gross income.

Qualified Roth withdrawals generally do not enter the calculation. That is one of the most practical reasons to have at least some Roth money available in retirement.

2. ACA premium tax credits

This one matters when you retire before 65 and buy health insurance through a Marketplace.

The credit is based on household income. Taxable retirement distributions, Roth conversions, and capital gains can all raise that income and reduce the credit.

The rules became less forgiving in 2026. In general, households with income above 400% of the federal poverty level are no longer eligible for the premium tax credit. The limits that previously capped how much excess advance credit some households had to repay also ended for 2026.

That creates a real planning risk.

A large December withdrawal could reduce your subsidy or push your income above the eligibility line after you have already received advance credits all year.

If you are using Marketplace insurance, model the health insurance effect before taking a large taxable distribution or Roth conversion.

The subsidy loss may cost more than the income tax.

3. Medicare IRMAA

IRMAA is the surcharge added to Medicare Part B and Part D premiums for people with higher incomes.

For 2026, the first surcharge begins above modified adjusted gross income of $109,000 for a single filer or $218,000 for a married couple filing jointly. CMS estimates that the income-related adjustments affect roughly 8% of Medicare Part B beneficiaries.

That means IRMAA is not the first concern for most of my readers.

But if your income is near one of the thresholds, a Roth conversion, capital gain, or large traditional withdrawal can affect more than your tax return. It can also raise Medicare premiums.

What a Required Minimum Distribution Actually Is

A required minimum distribution, or RMD, is the point at which tax deferral begins to end.

You spent decades contributing money to traditional retirement accounts without paying current income tax on it. Starting at a certain age, the government requires you to withdraw a minimum amount each year, whether you need the money or not.

You have to withdraw it. You do not have to spend it. Money you do not need can be reinvested in a regular taxable account.

When RMDs begin

For people born from 1951 through 1959, RMDs generally begin at age 73. For people born in 1960 or later, they generally begin at age 75.

There is an important exception. If you are still working, your employer’s plan may allow you to delay RMDs from that current workplace plan until you retire. This exception generally does not apply to traditional IRAs, SEP-IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, or people who own more than 5% of the employer sponsoring the plan.

Which accounts have them

Traditional IRAs and most traditional workplace retirement accounts have RMDs.

Roth IRAs do not have lifetime RMDs for the original owner. As of 2024, designated Roth accounts inside workplace plans no longer have lifetime RMDs either.

How much you must take

The basic calculation divides the account balance from the previous December 31 by a life-expectancy factor from an IRS table.

At age 73, the standard factor is 26.5. That produces a withdrawal of about 3.8% of the prior year-end balance. At age 81, the factor is 19.4, producing a little more than 5%.

The required amount is often smaller than people imagine.

The first-year trap

Your first RMD can generally be delayed until April 1 of the following year.

That sounds helpful, but the second RMD is still due by December 31 of that same year. Waiting can therefore place two required distributions on one tax return.

That may increase the amount of Social Security subject to tax, trigger Medicare surcharges, or push income into a higher bracket.

Delaying the first RMD is an option, not an automatic good deal.

Who is responsible

An IRA custodian must report the RMD amount or offer to calculate it. A workplace plan administrator should generally calculate the amount for the participant.

But the legal responsibility for taking the correct amount on time still belongs to you.

Do not assume that receiving a calculation means the withdrawal will happen automatically.

What to do if you miss one

Correct it promptly. Take the missed distribution, file Form 5329, and explain what happened.

The normal penalty is 25% of the shortfall and can fall to 10% when corrected within two years. The IRS may waive part or all of the penalty if the failure resulted from a reasonable error and you are fixing it.

This is one of the rare places where panic makes the situation worse. Fixing it quickly matters.

What to Do Next

Make a list of every account you own.

For each one, write down:

• the financial institution,

• the owner,

• the approximate balance,

• whether it is traditional, Roth, or already-taxed,

• whether it will eventually require an RMD, and

• who is listed as the beneficiary.

Do not worry about developing the perfect withdrawal plan yet.

The first step is knowing what kind of dollars you have.

That list tells you which withdrawals create ordinary income. It identifies the money you can use without increasing adjusted gross income. It shows where future required distributions will come from.

It is the map you need before making any larger retirement decision.

I never made that map for my mother.

I was handling her money in good faith, with no idea what I did not know. The first time the system required something from us, I missed it and paid for it.

This is not a hard mistake to avoid.

It just requires someone to tell you that the rules exist.

In Part 2, we will use the same three buckets to answer a different question: what should you do if the market drops just after you retire?

Your Hospital Bill Is Negotiable (And Might Be Erasable)

I was in my early twenties the first time I learned what a hospital bill can do to a person.

My now ex-wife was in graduate school and uninsured, and I was working for a small firm that didn’t offer coverage. We were both young, both healthy, and we’d run the same calculation a lot of people in their twenties run, which is that insurance is expensive and we feel fine, so why bother.

Then one afternoon she felt like she’d been punched in the chest.

We spent hours at Massachusetts General before anyone could tell us what was happening. A rare condition had sent a clot into her lung, a pulmonary embolism, and she was admitted and stayed more than a week. Somewhere in the middle of it I remember standing in a hallway doing math in my head, which was pointless, because there was no math to do. Neither of our families had money. We had no assets and almost no income. Whatever this was going to cost, we didn’t have it, and I couldn’t picture a version of the next several years where we did.

Subscribe now

What saved us was the generosity of other people. Our social worker at MGH sat down with us before discharge and went through the bill, and she explained that as a nonprofit hospital they kept funds set aside for patients who couldn’t pay. She walked us through the whole thing right there on our way out the door. Roughly 80% of that bill went away. Not all of it, and we made payments on the rest for three years, but it went from crushing to something we could carry.

The part I want you to notice is that MGH volunteered. Nobody made them. Most hospitals don’t, and if we’d walked into a different emergency room that afternoon, I don’t think that conversation ever happens.

Which is exactly why you need to know to ask.

The Number on the Bill Is Not the Number

Most people treat a hospital bill like a parking ticket. It shows up, it has a number on it, the number looks official, and you either pay it or feel bad about not paying it. But that number is an opening position, and sitting behind it is a legal process that can cut the bill substantially or erase it outright.

If you were treated at a nonprofit hospital, that hospital is legally required to have a written financial assistance policy, required to publish it, and required to accept your application. Roughly 60% of community hospitals in this country are nonprofits, so there’s a decent chance yours is one. Worth checking, because everything below rests on it.

For-profit hospitals are a different animal, with no federal obligation here whatsoever. Plenty of them run assistance programs anyway and some are quite generous, but they’re choosing to rather than being required to, and about nineteen states impose their own rules on for-profits to fill the gap. So still ask. You’re just asking rather than invoking.

The 240-Day Window

This is the piece I want you to remember even if you forget everything else.

Federal law (Section 501(r) of the tax code, if you want to look it up) requires every tax-exempt hospital to accept financial assistance applications for at least 240 days after they send you the first bill. Some hospitals allow longer, and none can allow less. That’s roughly eight months where the door is standing open and almost nobody walks through it, because almost nobody knows there’s a door.

The clock starts when that first statement arrives, not when you work up the nerve to open it. So if you’ve been avoiding a stack of mail because opening it feels worse than ignoring it, you likely have more time than you think, though the clock is running either way and it’s running right now.

This Is Not Just for Low-Income Families

I want to be blunt about this one, because it’s the single biggest reason people never apply. Middle-class families see the words “financial assistance,” decide it must be meant for someone worse off than they are, and throw the letter out. They have a job. They have insurance. They make a decent living. Surely this is for somebody else.

Hospitals set their own income thresholds and the variation between institutions is enormous. Many provide free care below roughly 200% of the federal poverty level, which for a family of four in 2026 lands around $66,000 of household income, and sliding-scale discounts commonly reach 300% or 400% of poverty, or somewhere between $99,000 and $132,000 for that same family. Some go further still. Hold all of those numbers loosely, because they move a great deal from one hospital to the next, but the direction is consistent and it’s the only thing you really need to take away: the limits are higher than you assume.

A few more things before you rule yourself out. Having insurance doesn’t disqualify you, because assistance applies to what you owe after insurance pays, which is usually the part that hurts. US citizenship isn’t required either.

And if you’re in an emergency, go. A federal law called EMTALA requires any hospital with an ER to screen and stabilize you regardless of your ability to pay, and they aren’t allowed to delay care while they ask about insurance. Never let a bill you’re afraid of keep you out of an emergency room. Deal with the paperwork afterward.

The Order You Do This In

There’s advice going around right now that says to get an itemized bill, ask for a prompt-pay discount, and then look into charity care. Follow that order and it can cost you thousands, because if you take a prompt-pay discount and settle the account, you may have just paid real money for something financial assistance would have wiped out completely. Bills in the tens of thousands do sometimes drop to a few hundred dollars through charity care. Nobody gets that result from a prompt-pay discount.

One. Request the itemized bill. Every line, every code, not the summary statement.

About twenty years ago I had emergency surgery. I had insurance that time and didn’t think to look closely at what came in the mail, but Karen went through it line by line (you’ve got to love a scientist). There were several small charges that didn’t belong, and then there was an entire day of hospital stay billed for a day I was not in the building. I would never have caught it, because I wasn’t looking. Errors like that turn up often enough that checking is always worth your time, and the itemized version is the only place you can see them.

Two. Apply for financial assistance. Before you negotiate, before you pay anything. The policy is on the hospital’s website, because it has to be, and if the form is confusing there’s usually a number for a hospital office that will help you fill it out. Regardless of how you get there, get it done.

Three. Then negotiate what’s left. This is where the prompt-pay discount belongs. Billing departments would generally rather collect something today than chase you for a year, so ask what discount is available for paying the balance in full, and get the answer in writing before you send any money.

Four. Then set up a payment plan for whatever’s still standing.

One more thing that trips people up constantly, and it caught me off guard the first time too: you’re probably getting more than one bill. The hospital bills you, and so does the radiologist who read your scan, the emergency physician who saw you, and the anesthesiologist if you had a procedure. These are frequently separate businesses sending separate bills, and the hospital’s assistance policy may cover some of them and not others. The policy has to list which providers are included, so read that list, then run all four steps again on every bill you received. It’s tedious. Do it anyway.

Gather Your Paperwork First

Most applications want some mix of recent pay stubs, last year’s tax return, and a couple of months of bank statements, and some ask for proof of household size. None of it is hard to find, but hunting for it one document at a time while a deadline runs is miserable, so pull it together in a single sitting.

Keep copies of everything you send, and note the date you sent it. Applications get lost, and you want to be able to say exactly what went out and when.

If You Already Paid

Pay a bill, then later apply and qualify, and the hospital has to refund you the difference between what you paid and what you should have owed as an assistance patient. That holds even if your account had already been handed to a collection agency, which surprises almost everyone.

So if you paid something in the last several months and you’re sitting here wondering whether you might have qualified, your 240 days may well still be running. It costs you an application to find out.

If It’s Already in Collections

The hospital can pull the account back. While your application is under review they have to pause aggressive collection activity, and if you send in something incomplete they’re required to tell you what’s missing and give you a real chance to fix it rather than simply denying you.

Call the hospital’s financial assistance office, not the collection agency. The agency can’t approve you and has no particular reason to mention that the program exists.

What This Means for Your Credit

A lot of people are working from outdated information here. The federal rule that would have banned medical debt from credit reports was struck down in July 2025, so there is no federal ban, and if you remember a headline from early 2025 saying medical debt was coming off credit reports, that’s what became of it.

What’s left is voluntary credit bureau policy, still in place as of this writing: medical collections under $500 aren’t reported, paid medical collections come off regardless of size, and unpaid medical debt doesn’t appear at all until it’s been delinquent a full year. Several states have passed their own protections on top of that, though the same court decision raised questions about whether federal law overrides them, and that fight isn’t finished.

The one-year grace period is what you can actually use. It’s your window to dispute errors, apply for assistance, or set up a plan before any of this touches your report, and it overlaps almost entirely with your 240 days.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Say you’re a family of four, household income around $72,000, holding a $9,400 emergency room bill. Your first instinct is probably that $72,000 is far too much money to qualify for anything, but at a lot of hospitals it isn’t. You’d be sitting at roughly 218% of the federal poverty level, which puts you inside the sliding-scale range at many institutions and within reach of free care at the more generous ones.

So you pull the itemized bill, find the policy on the hospital’s site, check their published thresholds against your income, gather two months of statements and last year’s return, and apply. Then you notice the separate $840 bill from the emergency physician group and you do the whole thing again for that one. What comes back varies enormously and I won’t promise you a number, but a substantial reduction is realistic and full forgiveness does happen.

Now rewind and run it the other way. The bill arrives, you call, they offer 30% off for paying today, and you put $6,580 on a credit card because it feels like you won something. You may have just paid $6,580 for a bill that would have cost you a few hundred, and you turned a debt with a one-year credit grace period into a card balance at 22% interest with no grace period at all.

Same bill, same family, two very different outcomes.

I was the responsible party for my mom in her final years. She lived in a different state, which made everything harder. Distance multiplies everything. But I had help. My aunts and uncles were incredibly engaged. One of my cousins stepped up. Without them, I couldn’t have done it.

I never regretted the time and emotion I put into supporting my mom, but I wish someone had prepared me for what my life was about to become.

Even with that team, I was often more underwater than I realized. Sometimes I asked for help. Other times, people offered it before I even knew I needed it. Toward the end of my mom’s life, I started building support more methodically, especially around the financial aspects. But for most of it, I was learning these lessons at the worst possible times.

People say yes to this role with good intentions. They mean it. But when reality hits, they often don’t realize just how much and how big it is. They get blindsided. And suddenly they’re dealing with two problems at once. Everything involved in caring for their parent, and the adjustments they have to make in their own life that they didn’t plan for.

This piece is not about whether to say yes- you need to say yes when someone needs you. This is about knowing what’s going to happen so you can prepare, build your team, and sustain it for the long haul.

What “Responsible Party” Actually Means

When you become the primary contact for an aging parent, you become what institutions call the “responsible party.” That phrase shows up on intake forms at doctors’ offices, nursing homes, and home care agencies. It sounds administrative. It’s not.

Being the responsible party means you’re the one the agency calls during a blizzard when caregivers can’t get there. You’re the one who has to figure it out when they literally run out of caregivers at any price. You’re the one who answers questions from the IRS, Social Security, Medicare, insurance companies, and banks. You’re the one who makes decisions when decisions need to be made. You’re the one who knows where the paperwork is, or has to find it.

You’re not necessarily doing all the caregiving yourself. But you’re the quarterback. When something falls through, it falls to you.

You also become the institutional memory.

Nobody else has the whole picture. The doctor knows medicine. The bank knows the checking account. Medicare knows Medicare. The home care agency knows the caregiver schedule. You become the only person connecting all of it.

The hardest part isn’t making one big decision. It’s managing fifty small systems that don’t talk to each other.

Subscribe now

The Scope: Everything That Falls Under “This”

Here’s what most people don’t realize until they’re in it. The role isn’t one thing. It’s many things, and they all require attention.

Medical coordination. Scheduling appointments and many times attending them. Talking to doctors, understanding diagnoses and treatment options. Managing medications and refills. Keeping track of what’s been prescribed and making sure every doctor knows what every other doctor prescribed. Letting the on-site caregivers know the prescriptions and checking they are right.

Financial management. Paying bills, managing bank accounts, investments, or pensions. Filing taxes or working with their accountant. Dealing with insurance claims and Medicare paperwork. Handling any issues that come up with the IRS or Social Security. Watching for scams and financial exploitation (which is becoming an even larger part of the job). And for each institution, you typically need separate documentation- the power of attorney isn’t “one and done.” Every bank has its own POA review process. Every brokerage has another. Every insurance company wants to see it again. It’s death by a thousand paper cuts.

Care coordination. Hiring caregivers if your parent is at home. Managing caregiver schedules, call-outs, gaps in coverage. Mediating when the caregivers (individually or between agencies) don’t get along. Working with home care agencies or facility staff. Handling the crises when the system breaks down.

Crisis response. The call that comes at 2 AM. The fall, the hospitalization, the sudden decline. The blizzard when no one can get there. The moment when home care is no longer enough and you need to find a nursing home fast. And often you’re making these decisions with incomplete information. That’s emotionally exhausting in a way that’s hard to describe until you’ve lived it.

Digital life. Passwords, email, phone. Medical portals, insurance portals, prescription apps. Your parent may not remember how or even be able to access any of it. Or the access may be tied to a phone number or email they can no longer use. This becomes enormous.

Emotional weight. Making decisions your parent used to make for themselves. Watching decline up close, even from a distance. Carrying the knowledge of how things really are, sometimes when others don’t want to hear it. Being the person who has to say “this isn’t working anymore.”

The Time: What This Looks Like in Your Life

Nobody told me how much time this would take. It wasn’t that I wouldn’t have done it. But I didn’t realize until I was up to my ears just how much I had gotten into.

The time shows up in pieces. It isn’t usually forty hours a week. It’s forty interruptions. Phone calls during your workday. Evenings spent on paperwork instead of with your family. Weekends consumed by visits or logistics. Mental space occupied even when you’re not actively doing something.

And it’s not steady. There are phases where it’s manageable and phases where it’s all-consuming. A hospitalization. A transition to a new level of care. A crisis with caregivers. These moments take over everything. And then they pass, until the next one.

What I learned. This role doesn’t fit neatly into the margins of your life. It reshapes your life. The sooner you accept that, the better you can plan for it.

Unless you can find someone else to take the quarterback role, your time has to come from somewhere. That might mean work accommodations like flexible hours, reduced travel, or using FMLA. It might mean less personal time, fewer hobbies, postponed plans. It might mean conversations with your spouse or partner about what this means for your household. It might mean accepting that some things just won’t happen for a while.

One practical thing- tell your manager what’s happening before you need flexibility. It’s much easier to ask for accommodations when your employer already knows the situation than to explain it in the middle of a crisis.

The Team: Why You Can’t Do This Alone

I would feel awful if anyone thought this was Gary versus the world. It wasn’t.

My aunts and uncles were invaluable. They covered gaps in care, especially during emergencies. They provided emotional support for my mom. And because she lived near them, not near me, they could tell me how she was really doing.

They could also tell me how the caregivers were doing with her. Sometimes people in these situations get frustrated, understandably, and project that onto their caregivers. Having family who could say “this is real” or “Mom’s having a hard day” was invaluable.

Even if one person is the quarterback, you need a team. The team might be other family members like siblings, aunts, uncles, or cousins. It might be close friends of your parent who can check in. It might be paid professionals like geriatric care managers or elder law attorneys. It might be the staff at agencies or facilities.

Building that team is part of the preparation, not something you do after you’re already overwhelmed.

Here’s something I learned about asking for help. People often say “let me know if you need anything.” They mean it. But they don’t know what to do. Be specific. Instead of waiting for them to figure it out, ask directly. Can you stay with Mom on Tuesday? Can you call Medicare about this claim? Can you drive her to the appointment next week? Can you bring groceries? People respond much better to specific requests than vague offers.

Care managers and agencies (especially in an institutional setting) can take a lot off your plate. But read the fine print. If they can’t get a caregiver at any price because of the labor market, or if it’s an extreme situation, it’s still your responsibility. And they generally don’t replace your legal or financial decision-making responsibilities. That’s still you.

The Preparation: What To Do Before You’re In It

Almost everything on this list gets harder once your parent can’t participate in it. Some of it becomes impossible. If capacity slips before the paperwork is done, you’re looking at guardianship proceedings, which are expensive, slow, and adversarial in a way nobody wants to experience with their own mother.

So the honest framing is this. Every item below is easy this year and hard later.

Build the team first. Before there’s a crisis, know who’s actually on it. Which siblings, which aunts and uncles, which of your parent’s friends will pick up the phone. Whether you need a geriatric care manager or an elder law attorney, and if so, find them now rather than during a hospitalization. The team is the thing that determines whether this is sustainable, and you can’t recruit one while you’re underwater.

Get the legal documents done, then pre-file them. Durable power of attorney and healthcare proxy, ideally drafted by an elder law attorney who knows your state. (I’ve written more about the documents themselves in Estate Planning Basics.)

Then do the part almost nobody does. Take the POA to every bank, brokerage, and insurance company your parent uses, and get each one to review and accept it on file now. Every institution has its own process, and some will reject a document another institution accepted without complaint. You want that fight to happen on a Tuesday afternoon when nothing is wrong, not on the day you need to move money to cover a nursing home deposit.

Ask for a HIPAA authorization too. This is separate from the healthcare proxy and it’s the one people miss. A proxy generally takes effect when your parent can no longer make decisions. A HIPAA authorization lets doctors talk to you while they still can. Without it, you’ll call for test results and get told they can’t discuss it with you.

Get access to the digital life, and understand that passwords aren’t enough. Set your parent up on a password vault while they can still learn to use it, and turn on the emergency access feature with you as the contact.

But the thing that will actually stop you is two-factor authentication. You can hold every password your parent has and still be locked out of their bank, because the login sends a code to a phone they can no longer operate. So you need control of the phone number and the email address, not just the credentials. Add yourself as an authorized user on the mobile account. Know the phone’s passcode. This sounds paranoid right up until the afternoon you’re standing in a hospital hallway trying to log into an insurance portal.

Build one document, and make sure someone else has it. Everything in one place: doctors and their numbers, current medications, account numbers, insurance policies, the attorney, the accountant, where the will is, where the deed is, where the safe deposit key is. You’re going to become the institutional memory whether you plan for it or not, so you may as well write the memory down.

Then give a copy to one other person you trust. If something happens to you, and you are in the years where something can happen to you, somebody has to be able to pick this up mid-flight.

Have the money conversation with your siblings before any money moves. Whose funds are paying for what. What happens when those funds run out. Whether anyone is being reimbursed for expenses or compensated for care. Say all of it out loud, early, while it’s hypothetical and nobody is exhausted.

And keep your money separate from your parent’s, with a record of every transfer. Two different people will eventually want to see those records: Medicaid, if long-term care enters the picture, because of the five-year look-back on transfers, and a sibling who wasn’t there and starts asking questions. Documentation protects you from both. (The LTC series covers the look-back rules in detail.)

Protect your own retirement while you do this. This is the part I almost never see written about, and it’s the part that follows you for thirty years.

Caregiving costs money in ways that don’t show up as an expense. Reduced hours, declined promotions, travel you can’t take, a job you leave early. Every one of those lowers your lifetime earnings, which lowers your Social Security benefit, which lowers your own floor in retirement.

So a few specifics. Don’t pause your 401(k) contributions, and especially don’t give up an employer match. Don’t pull from retirement accounts to pay for a parent’s care, because you’re converting protected money into a taxable event and there’s no way to put it back. If you leave work entirely and your spouse is still working, look into a spousal IRA so you don’t lose the year.

And if you’re the one providing hands-on care, look at a written personal care agreement between you and your parent. Done properly, it compensates you for real work, and it documents the money as payment for services rather than a gift, which matters enormously if Medicaid ever reviews the last five years of transfers.

Then ask for help specifically, the way we talked about above. Not “let me know if you need anything.” Tuesday, 2 o’clock, can you sit with her.

None of this makes the role smaller. It makes it survivable.

So Should You Do It?

Yes. Someone needs you. A parent, an aunt, an uncle, a grandparent. They need someone to be the responsible party. To make the calls, sign the forms, answer the questions, handle the crises.

This role is hard. It’s bigger than most people realize. And you’re probably going to say yes anyway, because that’s what family does.

You don’t have to do everything yourself. But someone has to own the whole picture.

Recently, a friend told me I was doing it all wrong.

Not investing wrong. Not saving in the wrong account. But wrong in the very way I was approaching wealth building.

Building wealth, he explained, has nothing to do with saving or being careful with your money. It’s about debt. That’s how Elon does it. That’s how all of them do it. So why would I be doing anything else?

I tried to offer the counterargument. After decades of talking about money with people, I had responses ready to go.

He wasn’t going to have it. As far as he was concerned, I was the one who was dead wrong.

The conversation stuck with me, and not because I minded losing it (which I always do). But because he isn’t gullible. He’s a sharp guy who reads things and thinks about them. He’d just picked up an idea that’s everywhere right now. A version of the truth that has the pieces in the wrong order.

There’s a whole genre of this on your feed at the moment, and if you’re in your forties or fifties or sixties, you're probably getting it even more frequently.

The pitch: the wealthy don’t earn and save like you do. They borrow. They never sell, so they never pay tax. They live off loans against assets that keep growing. So they spend money while making money.

It even has a name. Buy, borrow, die.

Parts of it are true at the very top. Almost none of it transfers to a household making $85,000 and trying to catch up, and the versions packaged for regular people are some of the most expensive financial products in existence.

Subscribe now

Look at the Order of Those Words

Buy. Borrow. Die.

Borrowing is step two.

You cannot borrow against an asset you don’t own. For example, if you don’t have equity in your home, you can’t take out a home equity loan. Equity secures the loan. Every version of this pitched to a working family inverts the sequence, telling you to borrow in order to acquire assets, which is precisely backward from what happened to the people in the story.

Step one is ownership. Step two is leverage. There is no version where step two comes first.

Elon Musk can pledge Tesla shares against debt because he owns those shares by building Tesla. Larry Ellison can pledge Oracle stock because he founded and built Oracle. The borrowing is a tax technique applied to wealth that already exists. Nobody at the top used it to get there. They use it once they are there.

What the Research Says

Rather than argue with influencers, I’d rather use the best data we have.

Three economists (Matthew Smith at Treasury, Owen Zidar at Princeton, Eric Zwick at Chicago Booth) built wealth estimates from administrative tax records instead of surveys, published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics in 2023. Two of their findings matter here.

At the top, wealth comes from private business ownership and public equity. Not leverage. Not clever borrowing. Ownership of companies.

For the bottom 90%, retirement and housing wealth account for almost all wealth. Retirement accounts and home equity. That is the American wealth machine for nearly everyone in this country.

There’s a third finding I keep coming back to. The households holding the largest share of American wealth aren’t billionaires at all. The group between the 90th and 99th percentile holds more than either the top 1% or the entire bottom 90%. Not private-jet people. Dentists, contractors, two-teacher households who owned a home and funded a 403(b) for thirty years.

Which changes the target. The reachable version of wealthy in this country got built by people doing ordinary things for a long time. The billionaire path isn’t a path; it’s an outcome a handful of company founders arrived at.

Being Honest About the Top

I’m not going to tell you buy-borrow-die is fake, because it isn’t entirely.

Ellison has pledged billions of dollars of stock as collateral. Musk has pledged Tesla shares. Documented facts.

It’s also contested. In a CNBC interview in May 2026, Jeff Bezos called the strategy a myth and said he pays tax on the stock he sells. Whether he’s right about the broader practice is a live argument, not a settled one, and I’m not going to pretend otherwise.

There’s a political fight wrapped around all of this too, with proposals to tax unrealized gains and competing methods for calculating what the very wealthy actually pay. People disagree about whether the current treatment is fair. I’m not taking sides on that here.

The Four Traps

What does worry me is how the myth of “Buy. Borrow. Die.” is how it is encouraging ordinary families to borrow money in ways that are likely to undermine reaching their goals.

401(k) loans

The most common, and the most misunderstood.

You’re not borrowing against the asset, you’re borrowing from it. The money leaves the account and stops compounding while it’s out. You pay yourself interest, which sounds clever until you notice you’re paying yourself interest on money that was already growing.

Then there’s the part nobody knows until it happens. Leave the job, and the loan comes due. If you don’t repay it, the plan offsets the outstanding balance against your account, and that offset gets treated as a distribution: ordinary income tax, plus a 10% penalty if you’re under 59½.

There’s one piece of mercy in the rules. Since 2018, once the offset happens, you have until your tax filing deadline for that year, including extensions, to come up with the money and roll it into an IRA to undo the tax hit. Often that’s a good deal longer than people expect.

Notice what it requires, though. It requires you to have the money. Which, if you just lost the job, is the entire problem.

HELOCs as an emergency fund

A home equity line of credit (HELOC) is not an emergency fund, because it isn’t guaranteed to be there.

During the credit crunch of 2008 and 2009, lenders froze and reduced home equity lines, and they did it exactly when people needed them. Not a hypothetical. It happened to a lot of households at the worst possible moment.

The billionaire’s collateral doesn’t get called. Yours can. And that means one of your greatest assets can go away in a heartbeat.

Margin loans and securities-backed lines

Same shape, different asset.

A margin call forces you to sell at the worst possible moment, the one outcome the entire strategy is supposed to prevent. It works at the very top because the loan is a rounding error against the collateral. So much cushion that no realistic market drop triggers anything.

On a $60,000 portfolio there is no cushion. The math that makes this safe for a billionaire is the same math that makes it dangerous for you.

“Infinite banking” and whole life insurance

Pitched as “be your own bank,” and marketed harder than the other three combined. I want to be fair here rather than dismissive.

Whole life is a real product that does a real job for a narrow set of people, mostly around estate liquidity and lifelong dependents. It is not a wealth-building engine. Commissions run heavy and front-loaded. Surrender charges commonly last ten to fifteen years, so your money isn’t really yours for a decade. Independent analyses have generally found long-run returns in the low single digits, though the number moves a lot depending on the policy and the assumptions. And if you borrow against the policy and don’t repay, it can lapse and hand you a taxable event on top of the loss.

If someone found you to sell you this, take that as information.

The tell across all four

Every one of these is a technique for managing wealth you already have, presented as a technique for creating wealth you don’t.

Someone is selling you the exit strategy as the entry strategy.

Once you see it, you’ll see it everywhere.

To Be Clear, Not All Debt Is a Trap

I don’t want to leave you thinking debt is the enemy, because that’s not what I believe and it isn’t what the four traps have in common.

There’s a real distinction between borrowing that buys you something productive and borrowing that buys you something consumed. A mortgage on a house you live in for twenty years. A loan for equipment that lets your business bill more hours. Financing a work truck that generates the income to pay for itself. That debt has a job, and the job is measurable.

The four traps above aren’t productive leverage. They’re borrowing against an asset you already own to chase a return that has to beat the cost of the loan plus the growth you interrupted. Sometimes that works. Usually it doesn’t, and when it fails it takes the underlying asset with it.

Productive leverage builds something. Consumption leverage moves money around and hopes.

(I’ve written more about this in Good Debt vs. Bad Debt, if you want the longer version.)

The Boring Version, With Numbers

Two households, both 45, both sitting on $30,000 in a 401(k).

Household A watches the Instagram reels and acts. They pull a $15,000 loan from the 401(k) to fund what the video called a cash-flowing asset. Year three, the job ends. The loan offsets. They owe income tax on the balance plus a 10% penalty, and they can’t roll it over, because they just lost their income. Call it $4,000 to $5,000 gone to tax and penalty, on top of $15,000 that spent three years not growing and then left permanently.

Household B does nothing interesting at all. They add $250 a month.

Run both to 65 at a modest return, and Household B ends up roughly $150,000 ahead. It gets there without needing a single thing to go right.

Why This Works on Smart People

I keep thinking about my friend, and I don’t think what happened to him was stupidity.

The Instagram version is seductive because it tells someone who feels behind that there’s a shortcut they were never shown. It’s flattering. It reframes why you’re behind: not that you had less to work with, but that you were kept outside a secret.

A much kinder story. Just not the true one.

Here’s the true one, and I’d argue it’s kinder still. The boring path is the actual path, the research backs it, and the people who look effortlessly wealthy mostly owned something and held it for thirty years. The largest share of American wealth sits with households who did exactly that.

Not a scolding. If you’ve been worn down by the sense that everyone else knows something you don’t, it ought to be a relief.

And the mechanism is available to you. Retirement accounts and home equity are the documented wealth machine for the bottom 90%. Not a metaphor and not a consolation prize. The actual thing, sitting right there, asking for nothing more exotic than time and contributions.

Every six months or so, Karen and I review our finances together. That’s not only to make sure we’re on track with savings goals, but also to remind each other where everything is and how to find it.

When I talk to people about their finances, the Survivor’s Penalty rarely comes up in advance. People are generally not aware of it. And though I don’t usually talk about it, I should.

The story about my mom is a good example. My dad’s pension was larger than hers, but when he passed, she lost the standard deduction for him. Even though her income was relatively modest, the tax hit was real. I didn’t think about it until I was doing her taxes that year, and it was an unpleasant surprise.

In her case, the impact lasted about four or five years. Then her health started to decline to the point where she was able to deduct medical expenses, and that offset things. But those intervening years were tighter than they needed to be.

Nobody wants to sit down with their spouse and say, “Hey, let’s plan for when one of us is dead.” But the couples who do this, even briefly, even awkwardly, are the ones who don’t get blindsided.

What the Survivor’s Penalty Actually Is

The Survivor’s Penalty has four components. Understanding them helps you see what’s coming.

Higher tax rates. When you file as Single instead of Married Filing Jointly, the tax brackets compress. The same income gets pushed into higher brackets faster.

Smaller deductions. The standard deduction for 2026 drops from $32,200 for Married Filing Jointly to $16,100 for Single. That’s a loss of $16,100 in deductions. If you’re 65 or older, you also lose one of the additional standard deductions. That’s $1,650 per person for married filers, $2,050 for single.

More Social Security taxation. More of your Social Security benefits may become taxable because single-filer thresholds are lower.

Potential Medicare surcharges. Medicare Part B and Part D premiums increase based on income through IRMAA. In 2026, IRMAA kicks in at $109,000 for single filers and $218,000 for Married Filing Jointly. A surviving spouse with the same household income, now measured against the lower single threshold, may owe Medicare surcharges based on income from two years prior. The jump from no IRMAA to the first tier costs roughly $1,148 per year per person.

When Does the Penalty Hit?

The timing depends on whether you qualify for Qualifying Surviving Spouse status.

If you have a dependent child living with you, you can file as Qualifying Surviving Spouse for two years after the year of death. That gives you three total years of the married tax treatment. The penalty hits in year four.

If you don’t have a dependent child, the penalty kicks in during year 2. Right after that first joint return.

Either way, it’s coming.

How Much Does This Actually Matter?

Here’s where I want to be honest. For most middle-income retirees, the Survivor’s Penalty requires rebudgeting rather than a radical restructuring of your financial plan.

Let me explain. If you’re a couple with $80,000 in combined retirement income, losing the joint filing status might cost you $2,000 to $4,000 more per year in taxes. That’s real money. It matters. But it’s not catastrophic.

The bigger issue is often that the surviving spouse is now living on less income overall. One Social Security check instead of two, one pension instead of two. The tax hit is on top of an income drop. This is especially impactful if the surviving spouse was the higher earner or retains income from their lost loved one (as in my mom's case, where she had her pension and my dad’s income, without the married deduction).

The point is this - know it’s coming, budget for it, but don’t necessarily upend your entire plan over it.

The Five Things Your Spouse Should Know Tonight

Before we get into planning strategies, there’s something more important. Could your spouse actually find everything if you died tomorrow?

Here’s what they need to know:

• Where the will is. Not “somewhere in the filing cabinet.” The exact location.

• Where the insurance policies are. Life insurance, health insurance, homeowners, auto. Physical copies or how to access them online.

• How to access the accounts. Bank accounts, investment accounts, retirement accounts. Usernames, passwords, or how to reach the institutions.

• Who prepares the taxes. The CPA’s name and contact information, or where the tax software login is stored.

• Who to call first. A financial advisor, an attorney, a trusted family member who can help coordinate.

This is the Survivors Package I mentioned in the previous post. If it doesn’t exist, create it. Tonight.

The Planning Levers You Can Pull

That said, here are the strategies that can help. Roughly in order of impact.

Know where everything is. This isn’t a tax strategy, but it’s the most important one. Karen and I go over our finances every six months as a reminder of where everything is and how to find it.

Understand Social Security survivor benefits. The surviving spouse can collect up to 100% of the deceased spouse’s benefit if claimed at full retirement age. If the deceased spouse delayed benefits until 70, those delayed retirement credits pass to the survivor.

This means the higher earner’s decision to delay can protect the surviving spouse. If Karen and I are doing planning, and she earns more, her decision to delay Social Security isn’t just about her. It’s about the monthly check I’d receive if she died first.

Consider Roth conversions while you’re both alive. Converting traditional IRA money to Roth while you’re married means paying taxes at lower married-filing-jointly rates. Once a spouse dies, the survivor pays single rates.

The math. Convert at lower married-filing-jointly rates now versus potentially higher single-filer rates later.

However, know that conversions create taxable income, which can affect Medicare premiums two years later through IRMAA. If you need the money in the short term, it may not make sense to convert and pay taxes now. For couples without large retirement balances, the benefit may be marginal.

Also, think about income timing. If a spouse is diagnosed with a terminal illness and there’s time to plan, consider accelerating income into years when you can still file jointly, or deferring income to years when the survivor’s total income will be lower.

Subscribe now

When to Start Thinking About This

In your 40s and 50s. Be aware that spouses do die during these decades. Know the basics. That filing status changes, that taxes may go up. Review your Survivors Package.

In your 60s. Get more concrete. Do you have a plan for who handles finances if one of you dies? Does the lower-earning spouse understand where everything is?

Once retired. You typically have your strategy set. Know that there’s flexibility in it for when this may happen. But don’t upend everything. Life expectancy is long, and other factors like medical expenses may mitigate the issue entirely, as happened with my mom.

How to Have the Conversation

This is a hard topic to bring up. “Hey, let’s plan for when one of us is dead” doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue.

I think you frame it as part of your end-of-life planning, just as you would talk about insurance or wills. “Remember, you’re going to have this additional expense. Let’s make sure we know what to expect.”

It isn’t easy. It is a bit morbid. But it’s also part of life.

The bigger challenge is that most couples don’t address it until after the significant other has died. Usually it falls on the children or other relatives to be the one to tell them. Or they find out the subsequent tax year. That conversation is much harder.

Better to have it now, briefly, awkwardly, together.

The Bottom Line

The Survivor’s Penalty is real. When a spouse dies, taxes go up. But for most couples, this is something to prepare for and budget for, not something that requires reengineering your entire retirement plan.

The most important thing you can do is know where everything is. Understand how your Social Security decision affects your spouse. Be aware that the penalty hits in year two or year four, depending on whether you have dependent children. And have the conversation, even briefly, while you’re both here to have it.

My dad died at 59, soon after retiring. There wasn’t even Social Security income yet. Just his pension and a very small 401(k).

In year one, the hardest part wasn’t the taxes themselves. It was getting my mom to engage with it at all. She was still grieving. Talking about something as seemingly mundane as taxes, with this huge life change looming over her, was painful. The financial documents, the things on my dad’s desk, were reminders of what she was going through.

At the time, I lived on the other side of the country. I ended up having to physically come back to help organize all the tax information. Not that their life was complicated. She had a small pension through the state; he had a larger one. But she had never been exposed to the financial side of their lives. My dad had handled it. She was a very smart person, but she’d just never been involved, and this was not the emotional time to learn.

The default was avoidance- a pattern I’ve seen again and again.

When your spouse dies, taxes are the last thing you want to think about. But deadlines don’t wait for grief to pass. And there are decisions in that first year that can save you money or cost you, if you don’t know the rules.

Here’s what most people don’t realize. The year of death is actually the easiest year, tax-wise. It’s the years that follow where the real hit comes.

The Year of Death: You Get One More Year of “Married”

In the year your spouse dies, you’re still considered married for tax purposes for the entire year. Even if they died on January 2nd.

This means you can file as Married Filing Jointly for that tax year, which gives you the full married standard deduction of $32,200 for 2026, access to the wider married tax brackets, and usually the lowest total tax bill.

The key rule. You can file jointly as long as you don’t remarry before the end of that tax year. If the death was in March 2026, you can file jointly for all of 2026.

What this return includes. Your spouse’s income from January 1 to the date of death, your income for the entire year, and all deductions and credits you would normally claim together.

Who signs the return. If you’re the surviving spouse, you sign the return. Write “Filing as Surviving Spouse” in the signature area. If a personal representative has been appointed for the estate, they may also need to sign.

The Two Years After: Qualifying Surviving Spouse

If you have a dependent child living with you, you may qualify for a special filing status called Qualifying Surviving Spouse for the two tax years after the year of death.

To qualify. You could have filed jointly with your spouse in the year they died, you didn’t remarry, you have a child, stepchild, or adopted child you claim as a dependent, you paid more than half the cost of maintaining your home, and your child lived with you the entire year except for temporary absences.

Why this matters. Qualifying Surviving Spouse status gives you the same tax rates and standard deduction as Married Filing Jointly. It’s a two-year bridge before the cliff.

If you don’t have a dependent child or you get re-married during this time, this status isn’t available to you. After the year of death, you’ll file as Single, or Head of Household if you have other qualifying dependents.

Then the Survivor’s Penalty Hits

If you don’t qualify as a Qualifying Surviving Spouse, the penalty comes in year two. If you do qualify, you get two extra years of the married tax treatment, but then the penalty comes in year four.

Either way, eventually you have to file as Single. And the math changes dramatically.

The standard deduction drops from $32,200 for Married Filing Jointly to $16,100 for Single (using 2026 numbers) a loss of $16,100 in deductions.

The tax brackets compress. The brackets for single filers are roughly half the size of married brackets. That means the same income gets pushed into higher rates faster. Often, several thousand dollars higher on the same income.

This is the Survivor’s Penalty. Your spouse is gone. Your income may have dropped. And your taxes go up.

The Survivors Package

Before anything else, I strongly encourage people to have what I call a Survivors Package prepared. This is the single most important thing you can do to help whoever is left behind.

The Survivors Package includes the will, all account information, insurance policies, union benefits, financial advisor and attorney contact information, and passwords. Store it electronically in a place where trusted family members can access it, plus a paper backup.

If this exists, everything else becomes manageable. If it doesn’t exist, the surviving spouse or family members search through drawers, guess at passwords, and make phone calls blindly. That’s the last thing anyone needs while grieving.

Subscribe now

What to Do in That First Year

When someone is grieving, they need someone to make things as easy as possible. Here’s the order I recommend.

First, designate a point person. If more than one family member is involved in supporting the survivor, pick one person to coordinate financial matters. Not everyone is doing everything. One person who makes sure things get done and keeps others from tripping over each other. This is a big responsibility while that person is likely also grieving.

Second, locate the Survivors Package. If it exists, start there. If it doesn’t, this is where the real work begins.

Third, contact Social Security. Call 1-800-772-1213 to report the death. There’s a one-time $255 lump sum death payment for eligible surviving spouses. You’ll also want to discuss monthly survivor benefits if applicable. A surviving spouse can collect up to 100% of the late spouse’s benefit, subject to claiming rules and age at claim. Benefits can begin as early as age 60, or 50 if disabled.

Fourth, contact banks and financial institutions. Make sure accounts stay liquid. Joint accounts often pass automatically to the surviving spouse. Accounts with designated beneficiaries typically bypass probate entirely. But some assets may require working with an estate attorney to transfer properly.

Fifth, contact insurance companies and unions. File life insurance claims. If the deceased was a union member, call the union. They often have death benefits and ongoing survivor benefits. When my dad passed, his union was incredibly helpful and quickly provided access to his death benefit and ongoing benefits to my mom as the surviving widow.

Sixth, secure financial records. Past tax returns, account statements, and investment records. Maybe that’s in the home of the survivor, but in many cases, another family member should take custody of them because of the painful memories associated with them.

Then, and only then, tackle taxes. Once you have the historical records, that’s when you call the CPA or sit down with the tax forms.

The Most Common Mistake: Avoidance

The most common mistake I see is missing deadlines in that first year.

The survivor is understandably overwhelmed. And this isn’t just older people who’ve been married many years. I’ve seen it with couples where one member dies particularly young. There may be children involved, work that’s hard to step away from. It’s easy to say “I’ll get to it.”

And then I’ve seen people come out of a stupor two or three years down the line and realize they’re behind on their taxes, and the IRS is charging penalties.

If you’re helping someone, don’t just email them a list and say “let me know when you’re done.” They will psychologically avoid it. Help them do it. Physically be there. Block off time. Go through it together.

Decisions to Avoid Making While Grieving

People often make poor financial decisions in the fog of grief.

Cashing out retirement accounts in a panic. Wanting everything to be liquid right now can trigger unnecessary taxes and penalties.

Selling the house too quickly. Especially if that home’s value is part of the long-term financial plan. A quick sale in grief mode can mean leaving money on the table.

Excessive spending. A desire to make the funeral grand, or a trip to relieve grief, or buying things. It’s not common, but I’ve seen it. And when they settle down, there’s a pile of debt.

The first year is for maintenance, not major decisions. If a decision can wait six months, let it wait.

The Bottom Line

Losing a spouse is one of the hardest things a person can go through. The financial side feels cold and mundane by comparison. But the deadlines are real, and the decisions matter.

If you’re going through this, or helping someone who is, take it one step at a time. Get help. Don’t try to do everything at once. And know that the first year, as hard as it is, is actually the gentler year for taxes. The real adjustment comes after.

In the next post, we’ll cover how to prepare for the Survivor’s Penalty before it happens. While both of you are still here to plan together.

When I first did contracting work in my mid-20s, I learned this lesson the hard way.

I had been working for a company. I moved out West, and the company still wanted to use me part-time to consult with them and do some work as an outsource. That first year I did well for a side job. It was very exciting. I spent the money. I did not think of anything around taxes.

At the end of the year, I got killed. I got killed because I had no deductions. I got killed because I did no tax planning, especially estimated taxes.

That inspired me to get very smart about tax law very quickly. I’ve stayed up on it ever since. Ultimately, it’s your responsibility — and estimated taxes are the same way.

If you have income that doesn’t have taxes withheld — side business, freelance work, investment income — you’re supposed to pay taxes quarterly, not just in April. A lot of people don’t know this, or they know it but ignore it and get hit with penalties.

Estimated taxes aren’t complicated once you understand the rules. And the penalties for getting it wrong are annoying but not catastrophic. This is figure-outable.

The Tax Lag Problem

Here’s what trips people up: you earn money now, but the taxes come due later. There’s a lag between when you make the money and when you owe on it. If you’re not setting aside money throughout the year, you won’t have it when the bill arrives.

This is especially dangerous with self-employment income because nothing is withheld automatically. The money hits your account and feels like it’s all yours. It’s not. Roughly 20-30% of it belongs to the government.

Who Actually Needs to Pay Estimated Taxes?

The general rule: if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in federal taxes after subtracting withholding and credits, you should be paying estimated taxes.

This typically includes self-employed people and side business owners, freelancers and 1099 contractors, people with significant investment income like dividends or capital gains or rental income, retirees with pension or withdrawal income that doesn’t have enough withheld, and anyone whose W-2 withholding doesn’t cover their total tax liability.

Who can skip it: if your W-2 withholding covers your tax bill, you’re fine. If you expect to owe less than $1,000, you’re fine.

The Deadlines

Estimated taxes are due four times a year.

Q1 is due April 15, for income earned January through March. Q2 is due June 15, for income earned April and May — yes, this is only 2 months. Q3 is due September 15, for income earned June through August. Q4 is due January 15 of the following year, for income earned September through December.

If the deadline falls on a weekend or holiday, it moves to the next business day.

Important: these are payment deadlines, not “figure it out later” deadlines. If you earn money in Q2 and don’t pay estimated taxes until April, you’ll owe penalties on the late payment. Even if you dump it all at the end of the year, the IRS can still hit you with a penalty because the payments were late.

The most common mistake is just not paying attention to when it’s due. This is one of those things where it costs you real money. Set up a reminder a week before each quarterly tax payment is due.

How to Calculate What You Owe

There are two main approaches.

Approach one: the safe harbor rule. If you pay estimated taxes equal to 100% of last year’s total tax liability — or 110% if your adjusted gross income was over $150,000 — you avoid the underpayment penalty, even if you end up owing more in April.

Divide last year’s tax by 4 and pay that amount each quarter.

Example: you owed $12,000 in total federal taxes last year. Pay $3,000 per quarter this year. Even if your income goes up and you owe more in April, you won’t owe penalties because you met the safe harbor.

Approach two: calculate based on current income. This is what I do. I base it on how much I’m declaring as profit. If you have a simple spreadsheet and you keep track of your expenses and how much you’re taking in, as a rough starting point, about 20% of your profit should be going out in estimated taxes.

This is a little better than the “year before” method because the year might be bigger or smaller. It keeps your payments in tune with what you’re actually making.

The problem with using last year: I talked to someone a couple weeks ago who admitted she’d put aside way too much in estimated taxes because she based it on the previous year — where she’d made a lot of money by chance. This year was a lot slower. That money had been tied up with the federal government.

Remember: ideally you’re not getting a refund. A refund just means the government borrowed your money and is now giving it back to you. It was never owed. The more you give them ahead of time, the less flexibility you have in your life.

How to Actually Pay

Online is the easiest. Go to IRS.gov/payments and use Direct Pay, which is free and pays from your bank account, or pay by card if you don’t mind the fees.

By mail works too. Send a check with a Form 1040-ES voucher to the IRS.

EFTPS — the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System — is the IRS’s payment system for businesses. You can schedule payments in advance.

My system is a modernized version of the envelope method. A lot of people our age grew up with variations on the “envelope system” for budgeting — you set up an envelope at the beginning of the month for each key expense like rent, groceries, utilities. When you get paid, you put the amount in each envelope so you know exactly how much you’ve set aside.

I use a variation of this for estimated taxes. I have a simple account — an adjunct to my main business account — where it’s separate from everything else. When I set aside taxes at the end of the month, I put it in that account. When I’m ready to pay my estimated taxes, I transfer it all into my business checking.

It makes it a lot easier to know that the money is no longer yours. And with the ease of setting up additional accounts within a given bank, it’s super simple to do.

Don’t Forget State Taxes

If you live in a state with income tax — most do — you probably owe state estimated taxes too. The rules and deadlines vary by state, but the concept is the same.

Forgetting state taxes is one of the most common mistakes I see.

Check your state’s estimated tax requirements. Many states follow the federal schedule, but not all.

The Safe Harbor

If your income last year was $150,000 or less: pay 100% of what you owed last year, divided by 4. That’s your quarterly payment. Even if you make more this year and owe more in April, you won’t owe penalties.

If your income last year was over $150,000: pay 110% of what you owed last year, divided by 4.

Alternatively: pay 90% of what you’ll owe this year, divided by 4. This is more accurate but requires estimating your current-year income, which is harder.

The bottom line: the safe harbor is your protection. If you pay at least 100% or 110% of last year’s tax throughout the year, the IRS can’t penalize you for underpayment — even if your income doubled and you owe a lot more in April.

The Penalty Isn’t the End of the World

The underpayment penalty is calculated based on how much you underpaid and how long the payment was late. For 2026, the penalty rate is roughly 7-8% annually, depending on the quarter.

Example: if you should have paid $2,000 in Q2 but paid nothing until you filed in April, you might owe $50-100 in penalties depending on the rate.

That’s annoying, but it’s not catastrophic. The real problem is the April surprise — suddenly owing $8,000 or $15,000 that you didn’t plan for.

A cautionary tale: I know somebody who didn’t pay estimated taxes, and it led to avoidance of paying their taxes entirely because they couldn’t afford the bill. At the end of the day, it took years for them to pay back the original plus the interest. So much money went into it — so much more than what they originally owed.

The Bottom Line

Estimated taxes aren’t complicated; they’re just a system you need to set up and maintain. Once you have a routine- calculate what you owe, set aside money each month, pay quarterly- it runs on autopilot.

If you haven’t made a payment yet, make one this week — even if it’s not perfect. The September 15 deadline is your chance to get it right. Calculate what you owe, make a payment, and set up a system going forward.

It’s one of those things where a little diligence saves you real money.

A friend of mine was in his late 50s when he got laid off during the Great Recession. Senior finance role, decades of experience, solid savings. He struggled to fina another job and so started planning to just coast into retirement — scale back, wait for Social Security and Medicare to kick in.

Then he priced health insurance.

The numbers didn’t work. Not even close. He ended up taking a job well below his previous level, primarily because it came with health coverage. A decade of career-building, and in the end, the deciding factor wasn’t the work or the title — it was the insurance.

I saw this again during the pandemic. A childcare business owner I know shuttered her center — parents working from home, enrollment collapsed, no path back to sustainable numbers. She decided to retire at 60. About a year in, she came to me asking how to balance working just enough to get by while making her way to Medicare and Social Security. Healthcare costs were eating her alive.

If you’re between 50 and 64 and you’re thinking about early retirement, or if you’ve just lost a job and you’re trying to figure out what comes next, this post is for you. Because the years between employer coverage and Medicare — what I call the Medicare Gap — can quietly cost $50,000 to $150,000. And most people don’t discover it until they’re already in crisis.

The Shock Most People Don’t See Coming

When you have employer coverage, health insurance feels almost invisible. A line on your paycheck — maybe $300 to $500 per month for family coverage. You barely notice it.

Then you see the real cost.

Under COBRA, you pay 100% of what the plan actually costs, plus a 2% administrative fee. If your employer was covering $1,200 per month of your premium, you now pay around $1,225 per month. For an older couple, COBRA typically runs $1,500 to $2,500 per month.

The ACA marketplace is the other option — and it can be affordable, but only if you qualify for subsidies. Here’s where it gets complicated.

The enhanced ACA subsidies that made marketplace coverage more affordable expired at the end of 2025. For a 60-year-old buying an unsubsidized plan, you’re looking at roughly $11,500 per year for a bronze plan in many markets, or around $16,000 for silver. For a 60-year-old couple just over the subsidy threshold, that’s often $24,000 to $40,000 per year depending on location.

Do the math: if you’re 60 and planning to retire at 62, you may need to budget $50,000 to $100,000 or more just for health insurance before Medicare kicks in at 65. Most people haven’t done this math. And by the time they do, their options are already limited.

Subscribe now

The Subsidy Cliff

The ACA provides subsidies to make marketplace insurance affordable — but only if your income stays below 400% of the federal poverty level.

For 2026 coverage, that means about $62,600 for a single person, roughly $84,600 for a couple, or around $128,600 for a family of four.

Here’s what the cliff looks like in practice. A 60-year-old earning $62,000 pays about $515 per month for a silver plan — roughly 10% of income. The same person earning $64,000 — just $2,000 more in annual income — pays around $1,245 per month, roughly 23% of income.

That extra $2,000 in earnings costs more than $8,700 in lost subsidies.

This is why income management matters in early retirement. And why things you might not think of as “income” — like Roth conversions, capital gains from selling investments, or retirement account withdrawals — can push you over the cliff and cost you $10,000 or more in a single year.

What Counts as Income

ACA subsidies are based on Modified Adjusted Gross Income. Understanding what increases and decreases your MAGI is essential if you’re trying to stay under the cliff.

Things that increase MAGI and can push you over: wages and self-employment income, IRA and 401(k) withdrawals, Roth conversions (the converted amount counts as income), capital gains from selling investments, dividends and interest, rental income, and unemployment benefits.

Things that can reduce MAGI and help you stay under: traditional 401(k) contributions, traditional IRA contributions if you’re eligible, HSA contributions, and SEP-IRA or Solo 401(k) contributions if you’re self-employed.

The Roth conversion trap is worth understanding. Many people in their late 50s and early 60s want to do Roth conversions while they’re in a lower tax bracket. Smart move in isolation — except that the converted amount counts as income for ACA purposes. A $30,000 Roth conversion could push you over the subsidy cliff and cost you $15,000 or more in lost subsidies. You need to plan these together, not separately.

Your Options

COBRA works best when you’re in active medical treatment and need continuity of care, when your employer plan has coverage you can’t replicate elsewhere, when you expect to get another job with benefits soon, or when you’ve already met your deductible for the year.

The details: coverage is retroactive to when your employer coverage ended, you have 60 days to elect, and duration is typically 18 months. Cost is the full premium plus a 2% administrative fee.

Here’s something most people don’t realize: you don’t have to elect COBRA immediately. You have 60 days, and if you elect on day 59, coverage is still retroactive to when you lost your employer plan. Use that time to compare your options. Price out ACA marketplace plans. If the marketplace is cheaper, take that. If you need a major procedure and your employer plan is better, elect COBRA. The 60-day window is a feature, not a deadline to panic about.

ACA Marketplace works best when your income qualifies for subsidies, when you can manage your income to stay under the cliff, or when you’re self-employed or have flexible income sources.

Open enrollment runs November 1 through January 15. But if you’ve lost a job, you qualify for special enrollment — a 60-day window triggered by losing coverage. Subsidies can make coverage very affordable if you qualify, though networks may be narrower than employer plans.

One tactical note: bronze plans are HSA-eligible. If you’re healthy and want to minimize premiums, a bronze plan plus HSA contributions can work well — and the HSA contributions reduce your MAGI, helping you stay under the subsidy cliff.

Spouse’s employer plan is worth considering if your spouse works for an employer offering coverage. Adding a spouse is a qualifying life event. May be expensive for family coverage, so compare it to subsidized ACA options before assuming it’s the best deal.

Short-term insurance is really only appropriate if you need very temporary bridge coverage for a few months and you’re healthy with no significant pre-existing conditions. The reality: pre-existing conditions are often excluded, benefits are limited, and it’s not a long-term solution. Can be cheap but carries real risk.

Medicaid is available if your income is very low. In states that expanded Medicaid, including Massachusetts, you may qualify if your income is below 138% of the federal poverty level — roughly $22,000 for a single person or $30,000 for a couple.

The Decision Framework

If you just lost your job, here’s the sequence. Don’t panic-elect COBRA on day one — you have 60 days and coverage is retroactive. Estimate your expected income for the rest of the year and determine whether you’ll be under $62,600 (single) or about $84,600 (couple). Go to healthcare.gov and price out marketplace plans with your income estimate. Compare COBRA cost to ACA cost, including subsidies if you’re eligible. Factor in whether you’re in active treatment, whether you need specific doctors, and what your deductible situation looks like.

If you’re considering early retirement, here’s what matters. Price health insurance before you decide, not after. Model your income for every year between retirement and 65. Understand what counts as “income” for ACA purposes, including Roth conversions and investment sales. Build health insurance costs into your retirement budget — $15,000 to $40,000 per year is a realistic planning range for an older couple without subsidies in many markets. Consider whether working a few more years for employer coverage changes the math.

What People Get Wrong

Assuming COBRA is the only option. COBRA is often more expensive than ACA marketplace coverage, especially if you qualify for subsidies. Always compare.

Not understanding how much COBRA actually costs. That $350 per month on your paycheck was your share. The full plan cost is $1,300 or more. The shock is real.

Not factoring health insurance into early retirement math. The friend who planned to retire at 60 without pricing insurance. The executive who couldn’t bridge to Medicare. This expense can break an early retirement plan.

Triggering a subsidy loss accidentally. Selling investments, doing Roth conversions, or taking too much from retirement accounts can push you over the cliff and cost you thousands. Plan your income deliberately.

Waiting too long to enroll. Special enrollment periods are 60 days. Miss them and you’re waiting for open enrollment or going uninsured.

The Bottom Line

The Medicare Gap — the years between employer coverage and Medicare — can be some of the most expensive in your entire financial life. This isn’t something you figure out after you’ve left your job or closed your business. It’s something you plan for — or it plans you.

If you’re 50 or older, know your number. Know what 400% of the poverty level means for your household. Know what health insurance actually costs when nobody else is paying for it.

And if you’re already in the gap — don’t panic. You have options. But you have to understand them to use them.

This week, go to healthcare.gov and price a plan as if you lost your job tomorrow. That’s how you find out what the Medicare Gap would actually cost you.

Share

When I was about 30, I changed jobs and had a 401(k) with about $25,000 in it. I thought the rollover paperwork would be simple and straightforward. I rushed through it myself, didn’t pay close attention, and accidentally triggered a distribution instead of a rollover.

The result: I had to pay income taxes plus the 10% early withdrawal penalty. After federal taxes, state taxes, and the penalty, I lost roughly $10,000 of that $25,000.

But here’s the part that really stings. That $25,000, left alone and compounding at 7% for 34 years until retirement, would have been worth roughly $200,000 to $250,000.

One paperwork mistake. A quarter million dollars gone.

I’ve consolidated other accounts since then — carefully and correctly. The lesson isn’t that rollovers are dangerous. The lesson is that this isn’t something to rush through. Take your time. Pay attention. Or get help.

If you have old 401(k)s scattered across former employers and feel a vague, nagging anxiety about them, this post is for you. There’s usually no rush. But there is a decision to make — and it’s worth making deliberately.

Your Options

When you leave a job with a 401(k), you generally have five choices.

You can leave it where it is — keep the money in your former employer’s plan. You can roll it to your new employer’s 401(k), if your new job offers a plan that accepts rollovers. You can roll it to a traditional IRA at a brokerage you choose. You can roll it to a Roth IRA, which means converting the money from pre-tax to post-tax and paying taxes on the conversion. Or you can cash it out — take the money as a distribution.

There’s no universal right answer. Each has trade-offs.

When to Leave It

Leaving your money in an old employer’s plan is often fine. It’s not laziness — sometimes it’s the right choice.

Consider leaving it if the plan has excellent investment options with low fees, if the plan has institutional pricing you can’t get in a retail IRA, if you have legal concerns (401(k)s have stronger creditor protections than IRAs in some states), or if you’re not sure what to do yet and want time to think.

Here’s the reality: 401(k) investment options have gotten much better over the past 20 years. It used to be that rolling over was often a clear win because employer plans had limited, expensive, underperforming options. That’s less true now. Most plans have solid low-cost index fund options.

The key is this: if you leave it, keep track of it. Update your beneficiary designations if your life changes. Don’t forget it exists.

I learned this one the hard way too. Years ago, I lost track of a pension from a company I worked at for a few years. It predated my wife. I never kept the annual statements. If anyone had asked how my spouse would access that money if I passed away, I wouldn’t have had an answer. In 2025, the company dissolved the pension and issued the funds so I could roll them into a traditional IRA. But honestly — I got lucky.

There are billions of dollars in unclaimed retirement accounts in the U.S. right now. People change jobs, move, forget to update addresses, and eventually lose track of money they earned. If you’re going to hold onto old accounts, there’s maintenance involved.

Subscribe now

Rolling to a Traditional IRA

This is the most common choice, and it’s often a good one.

The advantages: more investment options than most 401(k) plans, easier to consolidate multiple old accounts in one place, and you control the account — no need to track down old employers or worry about plan changes.

Here’s how to do it right. Open a traditional IRA at a brokerage — Fidelity, Schwab, and Vanguard are all solid choices. Request a direct rollover, also called a trustee-to-trustee transfer. The check should be made payable to your new custodian, not to you. This avoids any tax withholding or reporting complications.

What can go wrong: if the check is made payable to you, it’s treated as a distribution. You have 60 days to deposit it into an IRA, but your former employer will withhold 20% for taxes. You’ll have to make up that 20% from other funds to roll over the full amount — or pay taxes and penalties on the shortfall.

This is exactly what happened to me. Don’t let it happen to you.

Rolling to a Roth IRA

This is a more advanced move, but it can make sense in specific situations.

When you roll a traditional 401(k) to a Roth IRA, you’re converting the money from pre-tax to post-tax. That means you owe income taxes on the entire converted amount in the year of conversion.

When it might make sense: you’re in a low-income year (laid off, between jobs, early retirement), your tax bracket is lower now than you expect it to be in retirement, or you have cash available to pay the taxes without dipping into the retirement funds.

The math: if you have $50,000 in an old 401(k) and you’re in the 22% bracket, converting to Roth costs you $11,000 in federal taxes, plus state. But if you expect to be in a higher bracket in retirement, paying 22% now beats paying 32% later.

The risk: if you don’t have the cash to pay taxes and end up withdrawing from the account to cover them, you’ve defeated the purpose.

For most people in a typical job transition, a traditional IRA rollover is simpler. Roth conversion is worth considering if you’re in an unusually low-income year.

Cashing Out

Don’t. Unless you absolutely have no other option.

Cashing out triggers income taxes at your marginal rate — which could be 22%, 24%, 32% or more — plus a 10% early withdrawal penalty if you’re under 59½, plus state income taxes.

There are exceptions to the penalty. The Rule of 55 lets you access your 401(k) penalty-free if you leave your employer in the year you turn 55 or later. There are also exceptions for disability, certain medical expenses, and other specific situations. But most people don’t qualify for these, and even when the penalty is waived, you still owe income taxes.

The math on a $25,000 cash-out for someone in the 22% federal bracket with 5% state taxes: federal taxes take $5,500, the early withdrawal penalty takes $2,500, state taxes take $1,250. Total cost: $9,250. You receive $15,750.

You just lost 37% of your money. And that doesn’t count the decades of compound growth you’ve forfeited.

Even if you need money, look at the alternatives first. Under SECURE 2.0, you can take up to $1,000 per year for emergency expenses without the 10% penalty. A 401(k) loan from a current employer’s plan might be an option if you’re still employed there.

Cashing out should be the absolute last resort — and even then, think hard.

The “I Have Five Old 401(k)s” Problem

If you have multiple old accounts scattered across former employers, consolidation usually makes sense.

The benefits: one account to track, one statement, one beneficiary form. Easier to see your full retirement picture. Less chance of losing track of an account. Simpler for your spouse or heirs if something happens to you.

How to do it: pick one IRA custodian. Roll each old 401(k) into that single IRA. It may take a few phone calls and some paperwork, but once it’s done, you’re done.

One caution: if you have any after-tax contributions in an old 401(k), the rollover rules get more complicated. Check before you move.

What People Get Wrong

The first mistake is rushing it. There’s rarely an urgent deadline. Take your time, understand your options, and do it right. My story is a cautionary tale — acting fast without paying attention cost me a quarter million dollars in retirement wealth.

The second mistake is not keeping track. If you leave money in old plans, you have to maintain them. Update beneficiaries. Keep statements or at least account access information. Tell your spouse where the accounts are. Old accounts can become invisible — and that’s a nightmare for whoever has to find them later.

The third mistake is underestimating cash-out costs. People think “it’s taxable, I’ll deal with it.” They don’t think about the penalty. They don’t think about the lost growth. A $25,000 cash-out in your 30s isn’t $25,000 — it’s potentially $250,000 or more by retirement.

The fourth mistake is forgetting beneficiaries. Life changes — marriage, divorce, children, death of a spouse. If your beneficiary designation is outdated, the money may not go where you want it to.

The Bottom Line

Your old 401(k) is real money — money you’ll need in retirement. It deserves a deliberate decision, not default inaction or rushed paperwork.

In your 40s and 50s, these aren’t small decisions anymore. You don’t have decades to recover from avoidable mistakes.

There’s usually no urgency. You can leave it where it is while you figure out your plan. But eventually, you should make a choice: consolidate it somewhere you’ll keep track of it, or consciously decide to leave it and maintain it properly.

Don’t rush. Don’t forget. And definitely don’t cash it out unless you have absolutely no other choice.

This week, log into every retirement account you have and write them down in one place. That’s step one.

Share

I do a financial review twice a year — once in the first quarter to make plans, and again over the summer to make sure I’m hitting my goals and maximizing savings.

This habit started in my 30s, the hard way. One year, I ended up in December, scrambling to do a number of things I hadn’t kept up with. There were opportunities to contribute more to retirement and save on taxes. I also had a side business and hadn’t kept up with my estimated taxes that year.

It led to a very busy December on top of the holidays. I hated that scrambling. Not to mention that because my estimated taxes were late, I got dinged on a penalty. I should have paid them earlier in the year — I could have, I just never got to it and forgot.

Since then, I block time in July to run through my checklist. It’s not glamorous, but it’s the kind of maintenance that separates people who build wealth from people who just talk about it.

Half the year is gone. That’s not meant to stress you out — it’s an opportunity. July is the natural checkpoint to make sure you’re not leaving money on the table or heading for a surprise in April.

Most financial mistakes aren’t dramatic decisions.

They’re things you meant to do but didn’t get around to. This is your get-around-to-it moment.

This isn’t planning. This is maintenance.

1. Retirement Contributions: Are You On Pace?

Check your year-to-date contributions against the annual limits.

For 2026, the 401(k) base limit is $24,500. If you’re 50-59 or 64+, you can add another $8,000 in catch-up contributions for a total of $32,500. If you’re 60-63, there’s a super catch-up that lets you contribute an additional $11,250, for a total of $35,750.

IRA limits are $7,500, or $8,600 if you’re 50 or older.

HSA limits are $4,400 for individual coverage and $8,750 for family coverage, plus an extra $1,000 if you’re 55 or older.

The math is simple. If you’re contributing monthly, you should be at roughly 50% of your target by July 1. If you’re behind, calculate what monthly contribution you need for the rest of the year to hit your goal.

Also check: is your money actually being invested? I’ve seen people who had money sitting in cash accounts within their retirement or HSA accounts because they never set up the investment allocation. The money was there, but it wasn’t growing. Log into your accounts and verify that contributions are going into actual investments, not sitting in a default money market fund.

2. Estimated Tax Payments: Did You Make Q2? Are You Ready for Q3?

If you have side business income, freelance income, or significant investment income, you probably owe estimated taxes.

Q2 was due June 15. Q3 is due September 15.

If you missed Q2 or haven’t set up estimated payments, now is the time to get right with the IRS before the September deadline. Even if you dump it all at the end of the year, you can still get hit with an underpayment penalty because the payments were late.

Set a calendar reminder for September 10 to make your Q3 payment. Future you will thank present you.

3. Check Your Social Security Statement

Go to ssa.gov and log in. If you haven’t created an account, now is the time.

Look at your projected benefits at different claiming ages — 62, 67, and 70. Look at your earnings history. Are there any years missing or incorrect?

Errors happen, and they can affect your benefit calculation. Fixing them now is much easier than fixing them at 65.

If you’re self-employed, pay particular attention. It’s not unusual to realize how few credits you have if you’ve been minimizing your business profit. I’ve seen this be an eye-opener for many people — they make sure their profit is as tiny as possible for tax purposes, but that means fewer Social Security credits. It forces you to think about the balance between taxable income and those credits, because Social Security is a valuable part of your retirement.

4. Review Your Investment Allocation

The idea of using index funds is to set it and forget it — that’s statistically what works. I don’t touch my investments constantly.

But what I do check is making sure any dividends or new contributions aren’t sitting in cash accounts. I’ve seen people who had contributions flowing in but the money wasn’t being invested — it was just accumulating in a money market holding account.

Log into your investment accounts. Make sure new contributions and dividends are being invested according to your plan, not sitting in cash.

5. Recurring Subscriptions Audit

This one doesn’t get talked about enough in financial planning circles, but it should.

Look at your recurring costs — streaming services, apps, subscriptions, memberships. They accumulate quickly.

One time Karen and I realized we were paying for the same streaming service through two different access points — one through Apple TV and one directly. Neither of us knew. We’d each signed up separately when we wanted to watch a show and thought “oh, we don’t have it.”

Sure enough, we cut one of them. But neither of us would have noticed without looking.

Pull up your credit card and bank statements. Look at every recurring charge. Cancel what you’re not using. Consolidate duplicates.

6. Insurance Review

Summer is a good time to review your insurance coverage before renewal season hits in the fall.

Life insurance: still adequate? Any expiring policies? Disability: do you have it? Does it cover enough? Homeowners and auto: when do these renew? Time to shop around? Health: any changes coming for open enrollment?

A note: I’ve seen someone who didn’t really pay attention and didn’t realize their insurance had been canceled because there was a change in their account and the payment stopped withdrawing. It’s always good to double check — are the deductions actually happening?

Pull out your insurance policies and note renewal dates. Add reminders to shop alternatives 60 days before renewal.

7. Mid-Year Life Changes

Did anything significant happen in the first half of the year that affects your finances?

New job or job loss. Marriage, divorce, new baby. Kid graduated or moved out. Inheritance or windfall. Health diagnosis. Parent moved in or needed care.

Each of these triggers financial decisions — beneficiary updates, insurance changes, budget adjustments. If something changed, make sure your financial plan reflects it.

Common ones I see: new job and not setting up the investments for retirement, so money is sitting in a cash account. Divorce and not thinking about now only contributing for your retirement, not shared with a spouse. Or needing to rebudget and cut costs but not actually doing the rebudgeting.

If you had a major life event, make a list of the financial tasks it triggered and work through them.

What Most People Get Wrong

The first mistake is thinking “I’ll catch up in December.” December is chaotic. If you’re behind on contributions, start catching up now while you have six months of paychecks left.

The second mistake is not realizing estimated taxes are due — or paying them late. The penalty isn’t the end of the world, but it’s money you didn’t need to give away.

The third mistake is having cash sitting in accounts that should be invested. Whether it’s your HSA, your 401(k), or dividends that haven’t been reinvested — check that the money is actually working for you.

The fourth mistake is never looking at recurring expenses. Subscriptions, apps, memberships — they accumulate. Many times, people don’t realize how many there are until they look.

The Bottom Line

You don’t need to do all of this today. Pick one item on this list and do it this week. Not all seven — just one. Then do another one next week.

By the end of July, you’ll be in better shape than 90% of people who made big financial plans in January and haven’t looked at them since.

When I turned 50, some of my term insurance was expiring. Our kids were 10 and 7 — still young and dependent. And I have a genetic issue that makes insurance more expensive than standard rates, so it wasn’t as simple as “just renew at the normal 50-year-old rate.”

I had to think carefully. What would Karen and the kids need if I died tomorrow? How many years until the kids were independent? How many years until Karen could fully access retirement savings and Social Security? What was the actual dollar amount required to bridge that gap?

The answer wasn’t “replace my income for 30 years.” It was “cover the gap until the kids are out of college and Karen can access our retirement funds.”

Here’s something else I had to be honest about: Karen earns more than I do. That means our household needs more insurance on her than on me — not for ego reasons, but for math reasons. Different spouses need different coverage based on what their income actually provides to the family.

Life insurance isn’t about your life. It’s about the financial hole you leave behind.

If your term insurance is expiring or recently expired, you’re facing the same question I did. The answer isn’t automatically “renew” or “drop it.” The answer depends on what the money would actually need to do.

In your 40s and 50s, life insurance stops being a default purchase and becomes a math problem.

Quick Refresher: Term vs. Whole

Term insurance means you pay for coverage for a set period — 10, 20, or 30 years. If you die during that period, your beneficiaries get the payout. If you don’t, the policy ends and you get nothing back. It’s relatively cheap because most people outlive the term.

Whole life insurance provides coverage that lasts your entire life, with a savings component that builds “cash value” over time. Premiums are much higher. The investment returns often underperform simpler alternatives after fees and commissions. Agents often favor it because commissions are higher.

For most people, term is still the answer in your 50s. You’re buying protection, not an investment. Buy term, invest the difference. And be especially cautious about whole life pitches at this stage — you have fewer years for any “investment” component to grow, and the cost will be substantially higher because statistically you have fewer years remaining.

The Only Question That Matters

Before you decide anything about your expiring policy, ask: what would the money need to do if I died tomorrow?

Work backwards from the need.

Cover final expenses. A traditional funeral with viewing and burial typically costs $7,000 to $9,000 nationally, with cremation averaging around $6,300. Even if you think you “don’t need” life insurance, you probably need at least $10,000-$15,000 for final expenses — unless you have that amount earmarked elsewhere.

Replace income for your surviving spouse. How much does your income contribute to the household? For how many years until your spouse can access Social Security, retirement accounts, or other income sources?

Pay off remaining debts. Mortgage, car loans, other obligations. Would eliminating these change the math for your surviving spouse?

Fund children’s needs. If you still have dependent children, what do they need until they’re independent? College costs? Living expenses?

Bridge to retirement. If you died at 55, could your spouse make it to 65 for Medicare and 67 for full Social Security without your income?

The question isn’t “do I still need life insurance?” It’s “what would my family need, and for how long?”

The Protection Gap

The protection gap is the difference between what your family would need if you died tomorrow and what you currently have in place to cover it.

Twenty years ago, when you bought your term policy, the gap was probably large: young kids, big mortgage, not much savings, decades of income to replace. The number you picked made sense then.

But things have changed. The mortgage is smaller or paid off. The kids are older or grown. Your retirement accounts have grown. Your spouse may have their own career and income.

The biggest mistake is assuming the number you picked 20 years ago is still the right number today.

As your assets grow, your need for insurance should go down. That’s the goal. Insurance is for covering gaps — not for leaving a windfall.

Subscribe now

How to Calculate What You Actually Need

Start by calculating the income gap. Take your annual income, multiply it by the number of years until your spouse reaches financial independence — when Social Security kicks in, retirement accounts are accessible, kids are grown. This gives you a starting point — not the final answer.

Then subtract existing resources. Life insurance through work. Other policies still in force. Savings that could be liquidated. Your spouse’s own income and retirement projections. Social Security survivor benefits if applicable.

Then adjust for reality. You probably don’t need to replace 100% of your income — a surviving spouse will have reduced expenses in some areas. But you may need more coverage in early years when kids are still home and less later.

An example from my own situation. I earn around $80,000 per year. Kids will be independent in roughly 12 years. Karen earns more but would need help covering household expenses plus college costs for two kids. A rough calculation says $80,000 times 12 years equals $960,000 — but that’s probably overkill given Karen’s income and our existing savings. The realistic need after factoring everything: maybe $400,000 to $500,000 of coverage to bridge the gap.

Your numbers will be different. The framework is the same.

Your Options When Term Expires

Here are your real options — and when each makes sense.

Option 1: Renew the existing policy. Many term policies have a guaranteed renewability feature that lets you extend coverage without new medical underwriting. The catch: rate increases can be dramatic when the original term expires — sometimes several times the original premium. Check your policy documents to see what renewal would actually cost.

Option 2: Convert to permanent insurance. Some term policies allow you to convert to whole or universal life without a new medical exam. This can be valuable if your health has declined and you couldn’t qualify for new coverage. But conversion windows vary by carrier — often limited to the first 10-20 policy years or before a specific age. Don’t assume you can convert right before expiration. Check your policy now.

You can also do a partial conversion: convert a portion for lifelong needs like final expenses and keep the rest as more affordable term.

Option 3: Buy a new term policy. Shop for a completely new policy. You’ll go through medical underwriting again. If you’re healthy, this may be cheaper than renewing your existing policy at the inflated renewal rate. If you have significant health issues, this may not be an option. Get quotes before your current policy expires.

Option 4: Reduce coverage. You may not need as much as you did 20 years ago. The kids are older. The mortgage is smaller. A shorter term — 10 years instead of 20 — and a lower benefit amount may be more affordable and still meet your actual needs.

Option 5: Self-insure. If you have enough saved, and your spouse would be financially okay without additional insurance, you may not need coverage anymore. Just make sure you’ve done the math honestly. “We’ll be fine” is not a plan.

What to Watch Out For

Missing your conversion deadline. The timing to convert is dictated by your policy and insurer. Some policies let you convert anytime during the term. Others restrict it to the first 15 years of a 20-year term or before a certain age. Don’t let the clock run out on your options without knowing what they are.

Automatic renewal at predatory rates. By age 50, an annually renewable policy that initially cost $240 per year can become several times more expensive. Know your expiration date and shop alternatives before auto-renewal kicks in.

The “Return of Premium” trap. This rider promises that if you outlive your term, the insurance company returns every penny you paid in premiums. Sounds great. It can also significantly increase your monthly cost — sometimes dramatically. You’re almost always better off buying standard term and investing the difference yourself.

Waiting until you’re uninsurable. If you wait until you develop health problems, your options disappear. If you think you might need coverage, get it while you can still qualify. Honestly, this was

Both spouses carrying the same amount. If one spouse earns significantly more, that spouse needs more coverage. This isn’t about equality — it’s about math. Cover the income that would actually be lost.

Forgetting final expenses. Even if you don’t need income replacement coverage, make sure someone can pay for your funeral without financial hardship. That’s $10,000-$15,000 minimum that needs to come from somewhere.

What Most People Get Wrong

The first mistake is assuming they don’t need insurance because the kids are grown. Kids may be grown, but would your spouse be financially okay without your income until they can access Social Security and retirement funds?

The second mistake is renewing without shopping. Renewal rates are often terrible. Get quotes on new policies before deciding — you might be surprised.

The third mistake is not accounting for the income gap. Life insurance isn’t about “leaving money.” It’s about replacing income your family was counting on.

The fourth mistake is both spouses carrying the same coverage amount when their incomes are different. Insure the income, not the person.

The Bottom Line

Your term insurance expiring isn’t a crisis — it’s a decision point. The question isn’t “do I still need life insurance?” It’s “what would my family need if I died tomorrow, and how much would it cost to provide that?”

Do the math. Be honest about the gap. And if you need coverage, get it while you’re still healthy enough to qualify.

This week, pull out your policy documents and write down three things: your expiration date, your renewal rate, and your conversion deadline. That’s the information you need to make a real decision.

Share

Whenever I have the opportunity to personally test these things, I like to. That way I can speak from firsthand experience, not just what I read online.

I opened Trump Accounts for both of my kids. They are ages 15 and 11, so they don’t qualify for the $1,000 government seed (that’s only for children born between 2025 and 2028). But I wanted to see how the system works firsthand.

The process was easier than I expected. I did it when I prepared our 2025 taxes on TurboTax, and they made Form 4547 very easy to complete - basically it is just asking inforamtion about your children. Last week, I received the link to finalize the accounts- it only took a couple of minutes for both of them, combined. I just had to confirm the data, and I was told I’ll get a notice on July 4 when they’re open for contributions.

We don’t know exactly how the investment process will work yet, but given that the Treasury is using established financial institutions, I expect it will be straightforward, like most online investment accounts.

Trump Accounts got a lot of attention when they were announced. Free money for kids! A new way to save thousands! But now that they’re actually open, the question is- should put additional money in beyond the free $1,000?

For most families, Trump Accounts are often the least advantageous option for saving for your kids. The math makes the decision clear.

What Trump Accounts Actually Are

Let’s start with the basics before we crunch the numbers. Trump Accounts are custodial investment accounts for children under 18. Children born between 2025 and 2028 are eligible for a one-time $1,000 government contribution (it is technically a tax credit that is deposited in the account automatically). Family members and employers can make additional contributions up to $5,000 per year total, with employer contributions capped at $2,500 within that limit. All contributions by family memebers are made with after-tax money (that is, you cannot deducat the contribution from your taxes). The money must be invested in low-cost US stock index funds. No can be made until age 18. At 18, the account becomes subject to traditional IRA rules.

The timeline. Accounts officially opened last week for those who elected at tax time. Contributions can begin July 4, 2026 (and for those eligable, the $1,000 government seed will be deposited on July 4 or soon after).

Take the Free $1,000 If Your Child Qualifies

If your child was born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028, they’re eligible for the $1,000 government contribution. This is free money. Take it.

The math on $1,000 invested for 18 years at roughly 7% average return. Starting balance of $1,000, ending balance at 18 of about $3,380. That’s $2,380 in growth from money that cost you nothing.

Even with ordinary income tax on withdrawal, this is pure upside. You didn’t contribute it. You’re not giving up anything else to get it.

What you need to do. If you haven’t already, open the account via Form 4547 or TrumpAccounts.gov. When you receive the confirmation notice, finalize the account. When it opens July 4, make sure the $1,000 actually gets invested. Don’t let it sit in cash.

Free money only works if you follow through and invest it.

Share

But Should You Contribute Additional Money?

Here’s where it gets interesting. And where most coverage of Trump Accounts gets it wrong.

The Cato Institute recently published an analysis showing that Trump Accounts are often the least tax-advantaged savings vehicle available to families. That sounds surprising, so let me show you the math.

The Tax Treatment Nobody’s Talking About

When your child withdraws money from a Trump Account, the growth is taxed as ordinary income (just like a salary from a job). But when they sell investments in a regular brokerage account, the growth is taxed at capital gains rates (the rates for money you made in investments rather than earning in a job). Those rates are lower, potentially 0% for many of our readers.

For 2026, long-term capital gains are taxed at 0% for single filers with taxable income up to roughly $49,450. That means a young adult just starting out, in college or early career with low income, would pay nothing on investment gains in a regular brokerage account.

In a Trump Account, that same growth gets taxed as ordinary income. Even in the 12% bracket, that’s real money.

Let’s Run the Numbers

Let’s say a child is born in 2025 and gets the $1,000 government seed. You contribute an additional $1,000 per year for 18 years.

Assuming a 7% annual return, that means you contributed total contributions of $19,000 (the $1,000 seed plus $18,000 from you) and the account will be worth roughly $43,000 when your child is 18. So your investment grew by $24,000.

Now let’s say the child withdraws at 18 or 19 to help pay for college.

In a 529 plan used for education, tax on $24,000 in gains is $0. After-tax value of the total savings is $43,000.

In a Trump Account, the gains are taxed as ordinary income. Even at the lowest 10% bracket, that’s $2,400 in taxes. After-tax value is $40,600.

The Trump Account gives you $2,400 less than a 529. On the same contributions. With the same growth. For the same purpose.

If you or your child is in a higher bracket at withdrawal, the gap widens. At the 12% bracket, the tax is $2,880. At 22%, it’s $5,280.

For education savings, 529s win.

Why This Happens

The tax treatment of Trump Account contributions from family is unusual. And not in a good way.

You contribute with after-tax money, just like a regular brokerage account. But withdrawals of growth are taxed as ordinary income, unlike a regular brokerage account where long-term gains get the lower capital gains rate.

This is actually worse than a normal taxable account. In a regular brokerage account, your child would pay 0% on long-term gains if their taxable income is under roughly $49,450. In a Trump Account, they’d pay 10% or 12% on the same gains.

For 529 plans, the comparison is even more stark. Contributions are after-tax. Growth is tax-free when used for education. Tax on qualified withdrawals is $0.

Even a regular investment account is often better. Long-term capital gains are taxed at lower rates than earned income. For 2026, a single filer pays 0% on long-term gains if their taxable income is under roughly $49,450. So a parent or young adult with modest income would pay $0 on those same $24,000 in gains. Even if they’re above that threshold, the 15% capital gains rate still beats the 22% or 24% ordinary income rate they’d pay on Trump Account withdrawals.

Bottom line- If you’re saving for your child’s education, 529s win decisively.

When Trump Account Contributions Do Make Sense

There is one scenario where additional Trump Account contributions make sense.

The very rare case where you’ve already fully funded your child’s education, the 529 is maxed or not needed, and you want to boost your child’s future Roth IRA, and you’re comfortable locking the money away until they’re 18.

Here’s why. At age 18, the Trump Account becomes subject to traditional IRA rules. Your child can then convert it to a Roth IRA while they’re in a low tax bracket during college years or early career. If they convert when their income is low, they pay minimal tax. And then the money grows tax-free forever.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of families who will use this strategy and benefit from them are those who are already wealthy.

Better Options for Most Families

If you want to save for your children or grandchildren, here’s the priority order.

First, for education expenses, 529 plans. Tax-free growth for qualified education expenses. State tax deductions in many states. You control the account, not the child. You can change beneficiaries if one child doesn’t need it. And thanks to SECURE 2.0, up to $35,000 can be rolled to a Roth IRA if unused (and that will start bulding for a first home, retirement, or other expenses the child will have in life

Second, if the child has earned income (such as from babysitting or a part-time job or working for your business), custodial Roth IRAs. Tax-free growth. Tax-free qualified withdrawals. Contributions can be withdrawn anytime, though not earnings. This requires the child to have earned income from a job, babysitting, or similar work.

Third, for general savings and flexibility, brokerage accounts. No contribution limits and you can invest in anything. If your child uses the money when they are early in their career, long-term capital gains taxes are potentially 0%. The money can be used for anything - education, first car, apartment deposit.

Use Trump Accounts for the free $1,000 only. Take the government contribution for eligible kids. And if you do qualify, don’t let the $1,000 sit in cash. When the accounts open July 4, make sure the money is actually invested in the index funds so it will grow with your child.

Many years ago, I had a grand-aunt pass away. I received an unexpected check — not huge, but it was never planned for. It went straight to debt. That felt right because it was truly extra money.

A few years later, I got divorced. There was some money from joint property we had owned. It wasn’t much. But I didn’t treat it the same way. I knew that going forward, there would only be one income to rely on instead of two. So instead of paying off debt, I expanded my emergency savings. That cash cushion was more valuable than a slightly lower debt balance because it gave me flexibility during a time when my income situation had fundamentally changed.

Same person. Two lump sums. Completely different decisions.

Most financial advice treats all unexpected money the same: pay off debt, invest the rest, don’t do anything stupid. But that misses something crucial. Some money is a bonus on top of your life. Other money is supposed to replace something you lost.

Before you decide what to do with the money, you need to decide what the money is.

The Two Types of Money

Type 1: True Windfalls

This is money that wasn’t in the plan. It’s purely additive to your life — a bonus, not a replacement.

Examples: an unexpected work bonus or award, an inheritance from a relative you weren’t counting on, stock options from a startup that actually paid out, a small lottery win, a class action settlement, an insurance refund.

The grand-aunt check was this kind of money. It didn’t need to do anything except improve my situation. Paying off debt was the obvious move.

Type 2: Income Replacement Money

This is money that has a job to do. It’s not extra — it’s supposed to offset something you lost.

Examples: a divorce settlement from liquidated joint assets, a life insurance payout after a spouse’s death, a disability settlement, a severance from a job you were counting on.

The divorce settlement was this kind of money. It wasn’t a windfall. It was the financial foundation for a new chapter with different economics. Treating it like found money would have been a mistake.

In midlife, more of these checks are replacement money than windfalls. That’s worth remembering.

The Replacement Test

Before you do anything with a significant sum of money, ask yourself one question: is this replacing something, or is it purely extra?

If it’s replacing lost income, a lost spouse’s earnings, or lost earning capacity, it has a job to do. Treat it accordingly.

If it’s not replacing anything — if your life would be exactly the same without it — it’s a true windfall. Different rules apply.

The biggest mistake isn’t spending windfalls poorly. It’s treating replacement money like a windfall.

Framework for True Windfalls

If the money is genuinely extra — not replacing anything, not solving a crisis — here’s how to think about it.

First, check your emergency fund. If you don’t have three to six months of essential expenses in accessible savings, that’s the first priority.

Second, pay down debt. This is effectively a guaranteed return. If you’re paying 8% on a credit card, paying it off is the equivalent of earning 8% risk-free. It also reduces your monthly obligations, which creates breathing room in your budget.

But also — and this is the part most financial advice skips — take some of it and enjoy it.

This is the Monopoly game moment where a long-lost uncle leaves you money. This doesn’t happen every day. If you pay off $8,000 of debt instead of $10,000 but you also take your family on a trip you’ll remember forever, that’s a good trade. You’re not being irresponsible. You’re being human.

A reasonable guideline — not a rule — is to take 10–15% of a windfall for something that brings you joy. But cap it at around $3,000–$5,000 regardless of size. Beyond that, the money could meaningfully change your monthly budget if applied to debt or savings.

Some examples. A $1,000 bonus: $100–$150 for a nice dinner out, rest to debt or savings. A $5,000 inheritance: $500–$750 for something memorable, rest to debt. A $25,000 payout: $2,500–$3,000 for a trip or meaningful splurge, rest to debt and emergency fund.

The point isn’t to blow the money. The point is that pure windfalls are rare, and marking the moment matters.

Framework for Income Replacement Money

This is where most advice goes wrong. The instinct is to pay off debt immediately — it feels proactive and responsible. But the right first question is different: does this money need to replace an income stream?

Start by calculating your new budget reality. What’s your monthly budget without your spouse’s income, or without the job, or without the earning capacity you lost? What’s the gap between that and what you have coming in?

Then ask whether paying off debt actually closes that gap.

Here’s an example. Your spouse brought in $50,000 per year, and you received $200,000 in life insurance. Paying off a $200,000 mortgage saves maybe $1,500 per month — that’s $18,000 per year. But you’re still $32,000 per year short of replacing the lost income. The debt payoff helped, but it didn’t solve the problem.

Consider the alternatives. Keep more in liquid savings, the way I did after my divorce. Invest conservatively to generate income — in today’s environment, 4–5% on $200,000 is $8,000–$10,000 per year. Pay off high-interest debt but keep lower-interest debt and preserve liquidity. Or some combination.

There’s another layer most people don’t anticipate: losing an income source often raises your costs at the same moment it reduces your income. Some expenses that a two-income household absorbed invisibly become visible and unavoidable. Therapy for kids who are grieving or adjusting — and in many markets, most providers don’t take insurance, so you’re paying out of pocket. More childcare, not less, because you’re now managing everything alone. The gap between when you lose the income and when you can access Social Security survivor benefits or retirement funds — which can be months or years. These aren’t luxuries. They’re the cost of managing a harder situation with less support. When you’re calculating what your replacement money needs to do, budget for your new cost reality, not your old one.

Here’s the counterintuitive point. Sometimes keeping cash in a high-yield savings account earning 4–5% is smarter than paying off a 6% mortgage — even though the math alone might suggest otherwise — because if you have an emergency next year, you can’t easily get that money back out of the house. Cash flow matters more than net worth when you’ve lost an income source.

The cliché exists for a reason: cash is king. If you don’t have cash when you need it, it’s hard to get. And losing an income source creates a significant gap in your ability to access funds in an emergency.

The Renovation Disaster

I’ve seen this play out more than once. Someone gets an unexpectedly large bonus and decides to finally do the kitchen renovation they’d been putting off for years. The expenses balloon far beyond the original estimates — and once you’re in the middle of a construction project, you can’t back out. The contractor doesn’t take credit cards. They end up taking a 401(k) loan to finish the job.

A windfall turned into a financial setback because they didn’t keep any of it liquid.

Big money comes with emotion. And emotion is what leads to bad decisions.

Even with true windfalls, don’t commit all of it immediately. Put it in a high-yield savings account, let it sit for a few weeks, and make a plan. Big money decisions deserve time.

What Most People Get Wrong

The first mistake is treating all lump sums the same. Windfall money and replacement money are not the same thing. One is extra. The other has a job to do.

The second mistake is immediately paying off debt without thinking about cash flow. It feels proactive, but it may leave you without liquidity exactly when you need it most — especially if you’ve just lost an income source.

The third mistake is feeling guilty about enjoying a windfall, even when it’s truly extra money. If it’s genuinely not replacing anything, taking 10–15% for something that makes you or your family happy is not irresponsible. Give yourself permission.

The fourth mistake is not pausing before acting. Big money decisions deserve a few weeks of thinking. There’s no prize for speed. Put it somewhere safe, let the emotions settle, and then decide.

The Bottom Line

Before you do anything with unexpected money, ask yourself one question: is this replacing something I lost, or is it purely extra?

If it’s a true windfall, pay down debt, shore up your emergency fund, and take a little of it to enjoy. You’ve earned that.

If it’s income replacement money, think harder. The goal isn’t to eliminate debt — it’s to replace the cash flow you lost. Sometimes that means keeping more liquid than feels comfortable. Sometimes it means accepting that a 6% mortgage is fine if it means you have cash available for the next emergency.

Either way, don’t rush. Put the money somewhere safe, give yourself a few weeks, and make a plan that fits what the money actually needs to do.

If you’ve recently received a lump sum — or expect one — write down what it’s replacing before you do anything else.

Share

There’s a cruel irony in how benefits work. Leave money to someone on Medicaid or SSI — whether that’s a child with a disability, an aging parent, or even yourself after a health crisis — and you might actually hurt them, disqualifying them from the care they need.

A parent wants to provide for a disabled child. An adult child inherits money while their aging mother is on Medicaid. A lawsuit settles and suddenly there’s money in the account. Someone’s own savings, accumulated before a health crisis, now threatens their eligibility for care. In each case, the intention is good. But assets above $2,000 can disqualify someone from Supplemental Security Income. Assets above a similar threshold can disqualify them from Medicaid. The money that was supposed to help becomes the thing that cuts off their benefits.

Special Needs Trusts solve this problem. Most people have never heard of them — until they desperately need one.

What a Special Needs Trust Does

A Special Needs Trust holds assets outside the beneficiary’s name. Because the beneficiary doesn’t own the assets — the trust does — those assets don’t count toward SSI or Medicaid limits. This works the same way whether the beneficiary is a 30-year-old with a disability, an 85-year-old on Medicaid, or anyone in between.

The trust can pay for things that benefits don’t cover. Dental and vision care. Therapy beyond what Medicaid provides. Personal care items. Education and training. Recreation and travel. Technology like computers and phones. Transportation. Clothing. Entertainment. Supplemental caregiving.

What the trust generally shouldn’t pay for directly: food and shelter. Paying for these can reduce SSI benefits. There are workarounds, but they require careful structuring. This is one of many reasons you need professional guidance.

The key principle: the trust supplements government benefits rather than replacing them. It pays for what benefits don’t cover, improving quality of life without jeopardizing eligibility.

The Three Types

There are three kinds of Special Needs Trusts, and the differences matter.

Third-Party Special Needs Trust

This is funded by someone other than the beneficiary — parents, grandparents, adult children, other family members. It’s the most common type for estate planning.

The purpose: leave an inheritance to someone on benefits without disqualifying them.

The key advantage: no payback requirement. When the beneficiary dies, remaining funds go to whoever the trust designates — usually other family members. Medicaid doesn’t get repaid.

Example: Parents of a child with Down syndrome set up a third-party SNT as part of their estate plan. When they die, their assets flow into the trust rather than directly to their child. The trust pays for their adult child’s supplemental needs for life. When the child eventually dies, remaining funds go to siblings.

Another example: An adult daughter knows her mother may eventually need Medicaid for nursing home care. Rather than leaving an inheritance directly to her mother — which could disqualify her — she structures her estate to flow through a third-party SNT. Her mother gets supplemental support without losing benefits.

First-Party Special Needs Trust

This is funded by the beneficiary’s own assets — an inheritance they received directly, a legal settlement, savings accumulated before becoming disabled or needing Medicaid.

The purpose: when someone already has assets that would disqualify them from benefits, this trust preserves eligibility.

The key disadvantage: payback requirement. When the beneficiary dies, Medicaid must be repaid from remaining trust assets before anything goes to heirs.

Example: A 45-year-old receives a $500,000 settlement from a car accident that left them disabled. They can’t keep the money in their own name and stay on Medicaid. Solution: put it in a first-party SNT. Medicaid eligibility is preserved. But when they die, Medicaid gets repaid from whatever remains.

Another example: An 80-year-old sold the family home and now has $200,000 in cash — too much to qualify for Medicaid nursing home coverage. A first-party SNT can preserve eligibility while that money funds supplemental care. Medicaid will recover what it paid from whatever remains at death, but in the meantime, the trust improves quality of life.

Pooled Special Needs Trust

This is run by a nonprofit organization. Multiple beneficiaries’ funds are pooled for investment purposes, but each person has a separate account.

The advantages: professional management, lower setup costs than an individual trust, good for smaller amounts, and easier to establish quickly. This makes it accessible for aging parents who need something set up fast, not just for families doing long-term disability planning.

The payback situation: the nonprofit typically retains remaining funds at death to support their disability services work. Some states allow a portion to go to family.

This is what we used for my mother. We worked with a nonprofit, filled out the paperwork, and set it up relatively quickly. Her pensions flowed into the trust without disqualifying her from Medicaid. As trustee, I processed all distribution requests — reviewed whether expenses were eligible, paid vendors directly or submitted for reimbursement. It required ongoing attention, but it was manageable.

Share

The “It’s Not Your Money” Reality

This is the hardest part for families to understand — whether they’re setting up a trust for a disabled child, an aging parent, or themselves.

Once assets are in a Special Needs Trust, the beneficiary cannot withdraw them freely. The trust owns the assets. A trustee — either a family member or a professional — manages all distributions. The beneficiary requests a purchase; the trustee evaluates whether it’s an eligible expense and pays the vendor directly. Cash advances to the beneficiary are generally prohibited.

This feels restrictive. It is restrictive. But that’s the point.

If the beneficiary could access the money freely, it would count as their asset and disqualify them from benefits. The restriction is what makes the protection work.

What this looks like in practice: Mom needed something, I reviewed whether it was an eligible expense, then either paid the vendor directly or submitted for reimbursement. It required documentation and record-keeping. Not complicated, but not hands-off either.

When to Set One Up

For a third-party SNT: ideally while you’re still alive and doing estate planning. This should be part of any estate plan that includes a beneficiary on government benefits — whether that’s a disabled child, a sibling, or an aging parent. Don’t leave money directly to someone on benefits. Even with good intentions, it can backfire.

For a first-party SNT: when someone receives assets that would otherwise disqualify them. This might be an inheritance, a legal settlement, or accumulated savings. The trust needs to be established before the assets disqualify them from benefits.

For a pooled SNT: can be set up quickly when needed. A good option when an individual trust isn’t practical due to cost or complexity, or when time is short.

For yourself: if you’re approaching a point where you might need Medicaid, and you have assets that would disqualify you, talk to an elder law attorney about whether a trust makes sense. The time to plan is before you’re in crisis — not after.

What Most People Get Wrong

The first mistake is leaving money directly to someone on benefits. Whether it’s a disabled family member or an aging parent on Medicaid, even well-intentioned inheritances can disqualify them. Always use a trust.

The second mistake is thinking people on SSI or Medicaid can’t have nice things. They can — through a properly structured SNT. The trust pays for what benefits don’t cover. Quality of life can be significantly better with supplemental resources.

The third mistake is not understanding the payback rules. First-party trusts require Medicaid repayment at death. Third-party trusts don’t. This is a critical distinction that affects how you structure everything.

The fourth mistake is trying to set up the trust yourself. SNTs must comply with federal and state law. The rules are specific and the consequences of getting them wrong are severe. Work with an attorney who specializes in special needs planning or elder law.

The fifth mistake is waiting until crisis. Like Medicaid planning, this works best when done in advance. Parents should set up third-party SNTs as part of their estate planning. Adult children should think about how their own estates might affect aging parents on benefits. And anyone approaching the need for Medicaid should explore their options while they still have them.

The Bottom Line

Special Needs Trusts are one of those tools most families don’t know about until they desperately need one — and by then, they’re scrambling.

If you have a family member with disabilities, an aging parent who might need Medicaid, or you’re doing your own long-term care planning, ask your attorney about SNTs. They’re not complicated to use once established, and they can mean the difference between preserved benefits and a disqualifying inheritance.

The goal is simple: protect eligibility while improving quality of life. The trust is just the mechanism.

If someone in your life is on SSI or Medicaid — or might be someday — make sure your estate plan accounts for it. That includes disabled children, aging parents, and potentially yourself. Don’t leave money in a way that disqualifies them from care. Leave it through a trust that protects what they need most.

Subscribe now

When most people hear 'Medicaid,' they assume it doesn't apply to them. That’s not quite right.

Medicaid is actually how most nursing home care in America gets paid for. Not because families start out poor — but because nursing home care is so expensive that even middle-class families exhaust their savings. At $115,000 per year, a three-year stay burns through $345,000. A five-year stay burns through $575,000. Most people don’t have that kind of money sitting around. So they spend down what they have, and then Medicaid takes over.

This isn’t a failure of planning. It’s how the system is designed.

Medicaid planning isn’t about money first. It’s about timing.

The question is whether you spend down blindly — or whether you understand the rules well enough to protect what you can.

In your 40s and 50s, this isn’t about you yet. It’s about your parents — and the decisions you may have to make for them.

How Medicaid for Long-Term Care Actually Works

Medicaid is a “payer of last resort.” It covers nursing home care only after you’ve spent down most of your assets. The rules are strict, and they vary by state, but here’s the simplified version of how eligibility works.

The individual asset limit in most states is $2,000. That’s not a typo. Two thousand dollars in countable assets is the threshold for eligibility.

The income limit is around $2,900 per month in many states, though some states use different “spend-down” rules instead.

The home equity limit is roughly $750,000 in most states, though some states — including Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and a few others — set the limit at about $1.1 million.

What counts as an asset? Bank accounts. Investments. Retirement accounts may count depending on how they’re structured and whether distributions are being taken. Second homes or rental properties. Cash value life insurance above a certain threshold.

What’s exempt? Your primary residence, with conditions. One vehicle. Personal belongings and household goods. Pre-paid funeral arrangements through an irrevocable funeral trust.

The goal of Medicaid planning is to structure your assets so that what can be protected is protected — and what needs to be spent down is spent on legitimate expenses rather than simply handed over.

The 5-Year Rule

This is where most people get tripped up — and why timing matters more than almost anything else.

When you apply for Medicaid, the state reviews the previous 60 months of your financial transactions. That’s five years. They’re looking for assets you gave away or sold below fair market value. If they find transfers that look like you were trying to hide assets, you’ll face a penalty period — a period of ineligibility based on the value of what you transferred.

Here’s how it works. Say nursing home care in your state costs $10,000 per month. Three years ago, you gave $50,000 to your kids. When you apply for Medicaid, the state calculates a penalty: $50,000 divided by $10,000 equals five months of ineligibility. During those five months, you need nursing home care but Medicaid won’t pay — and you already gave the money away, so you can’t pay either.

This is the trap. People think they can give away assets and then qualify for Medicaid. They can’t — at least not if they do it within five years of needing care.

One exception: California has different and evolving rules, including shorter or eliminated look-back periods for some programs.

Medicaid planning is fundamentally about time — what you can do five years in advance versus what you can do in a crisis. Once you’re in crisis, many options are off the table.

Legitimate Spend-Down Strategies

These are not loopholes. They are the rules.

There are legal ways to reduce countable assets before applying for Medicaid. This isn’t cheating the system. It’s using the rules as they’re written.

Pay off debt. Mortgage payments, credit card balances, medical bills, car loans — all legitimate uses of assets that reduce your countable total.

Make home improvements. Accessibility modifications like ramps, grab bars, and walk-in tubs. Necessary repairs like a new roof or HVAC system. These improve your exempt home without counting as gifts.

Purchase exempt assets. A vehicle of reasonable value. Medical equipment. Furniture and household goods. Pre-paid funeral arrangements through an irrevocable funeral trust — typically $7,500 to $15,000, fully Medicaid-exempt, and outside the look-back rules.

Pay for care directly. While you have assets, pay for nursing home care yourself. Once you’ve depleted to the $2,000 threshold, apply for Medicaid.

This is generally how Medicaid is designed to work. Spend down your assets on care and legitimate needs, then qualify for assistance.

Subscribe now

Protecting the Home

The family home is often the largest asset, and protecting it is a major concern for most families.

While you’re alive, the home is exempt if you live there, your spouse lives there, or you have documented “intent to return.” It must be under the equity limit — roughly $750,000 in most states, about $1.1 million in others.

The complication comes after death. Under the Medicaid Estate Recovery Program, states can recover the cost of care they paid from your estate after you die. The primary target is usually the family home. This is how states recoup nursing home costs — they put a claim against the house.

One protection strategy is an irrevocable trust. Transfer the home to an irrevocable trust, and it’s no longer part of your estate. Medicaid can’t recover it after your death.

But there’s a catch. The transfer must happen more than 60 months before you need Medicaid — outside the look-back window. And “irrevocable” means exactly what it sounds like. You give up control permanently. You can’t change your mind, can’t sell the house without trustee approval, can’t take it back.

My mother hesitated on this for years — understandably. Giving up control of your home is emotionally difficult. It means acknowledging that you might need care someday, that you might not be able to manage on your own. But waiting too long means the option disappears. By the time you need care, the five-year window has closed.

Community Spouse Protections

When one spouse needs nursing home care and the other doesn’t, there are protections to prevent the healthy spouse from being impoverished.

The Community Spouse Resource Allowance lets the non-applicant spouse keep up to roughly $162,000 in assets in 2026. This is on top of the home, which remains exempt as long as the community spouse lives there.

There are also income protections. The community spouse may receive a portion of the Medicaid spouse’s income, particularly from retirement accounts. Rules vary by state, so this is an area where professional guidance matters.

The point of these rules is simple: when one spouse needs care, the other shouldn’t be left destitute.

Home-Based Care Through Medicaid

Nursing homes aren’t the only option. Every state offers home-based Medicaid care programs, and for many families, keeping a loved one at home as long as possible is the goal.

How it works: Medicaid can pay for home health aides, adult day programs, and other services that allow people to stay in their homes. It’s often cheaper for the state than nursing home care, which creates an incentive to support home-based options.

The reality is more complicated. When my mother qualified for 24-hour nursing home care, the state awarded 16 hours of home-based care instead. Even with the award, agencies couldn’t staff it. “We have the funding but can’t fill the positions,” they told us. We filled the gaps with family — my mother’s siblings taking emergency shifts — but it wasn’t sustainable.

Massachusetts has particularly good home-based programs. California, Texas, and Florida also have strong options. But availability varies widely, and some states have waitlists.

The honest truth: home-based Medicaid care can delay nursing home placement, but for severe cases, it rarely eliminates the need entirely.

Work With an Elder Law Attorney

This is not DIY territory.

Medicaid rules are complex. They vary by state. The stakes are high — one mistake can cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. An elder law attorney specializes in exactly this: asset protection, trust setup, Medicaid applications, and state-specific compliance.

When to engage: before crisis. Ideally when parents hit their late 70s, or at the first serious diagnosis. Not when someone is already in the hospital and needs placement next week.

What they do: develop an asset protection strategy, set up trusts if appropriate, navigate the Medicaid application process, and ensure compliance with state-specific rules.

Cost: typically $5,000 to $12,000 for a comprehensive Medicaid planning package. That sounds like a lot until you compare it to the $100,000+ per year you’re trying to manage.

What Most People Get Wrong

The first mistake is waiting until crisis. By then, the five-year look-back eliminates most planning options. The time to plan is years before you need care, not days.

The second mistake is thinking Medicaid planning is cheating. It’s not. These are the rules as written. Using them properly is responsible planning — the same way using tax deductions is responsible tax planning.

The third mistake is not understanding what “irrevocable” means. Once assets are in an irrevocable trust, you’ve given up control. This is a serious decision that requires clear thinking and professional guidance.

The fourth mistake is assuming home-based care solves everything. It helps, but staffing shortages and care needs often exceed what’s awarded. Home care buys time; it doesn’t always eliminate the need for facility care.

The fifth mistake is trying to handle the Medicaid application alone. States can deny applications for technical errors. Work with someone who knows the system.

The Bottom Line

Medicaid planning isn’t about gaming the system. It’s about understanding the rules and using them to protect what you’ve spent a lifetime building.

The key is starting early — before the five-year clock starts ticking against you. If your parents are in their late 70s or have had a serious diagnosis, now is the time to talk to an elder law attorney. Not when you’re in crisis. Now — while you still have options.

If your parents are over 70, ask them one question this week: have you talked to an elder law attorney about Medicaid planning?

In Part 3, we’ll cover Special Needs Trusts — a specific tool for protecting assets while maintaining benefit eligibility, whether for aging parents or family members with disabilities.

Share

My father had a good long-term care policy in the mid-90s. Then he switched to a cheaper one. The new policy only covered 90 days of rehabilitative care — the kind you need after a hip replacement or a stroke, when you’re expected to recover and go home.

When my mother was diagnosed with Parkinson’s, the policy was useless. She didn’t need 90 days of rehab. She needed years of daily help with the basics — getting dressed, eating, bathing, moving safely through the house.

The doctors said she might live another 10 years. She lived 20.

The plans our family had built around that policy — the assumption that insurance would cover a significant portion of her care — collapsed. We found a way. But it took everything we had, financially and otherwise.

If you’re in your 40s, 50s, or 60s, this probably isn’t something you want to think about. It feels morbid. It feels far away. And then suddenly it’s not — and the costs are staggering.

The Costs Nobody Talks About

This is what long-term care actually costs today.

A semi-private room in a nursing home runs roughly $315 per day in many markets. That’s roughly $115,000 per year. A private room runs closer to $350 per day — roughly $128,000 per year. In high-cost areas like the Northeast or California, you’re looking at $140,000 to $180,000 annually.

Assisted living averages roughly $6,200 per month nationally, or about $75,000 per year. Memory care units, for dementia and Alzheimer’s patients, typically add another $1,000 to $2,500 per month on top of that.

Home health aides cost $30 to $50 per hour depending on where you live. Twenty hours a week runs $2,600 to $4,300 per month. Forty hours a week — which sounds like a lot until you realize it’s just daytime coverage — runs $5,200 to $8,600 per month. And if you need 24/7 care at home through an agency, which is what many people actually need? That’s $22,000 to $36,000 per month. $260,000 to $430,000 per year.

Do the math on a typical nursing home stay. Three years at $115,000 per year is $345,000. Five years is $575,000. And that’s at today’s prices.

A single long-term care event can drain a lifetime of savings in three to five years. Most people don’t discover this until they’re in crisis.

The Medicare Gap

Here’s the misconception that devastates families: most people assume Medicare covers nursing home care.

It doesn’t. At least not the way they think.

Medicare covers skilled nursing care — the kind that requires medical professionals, like IV medication after surgery or physical therapy after a hospital stay. And even that coverage is limited. Days 1 through 20 are fully covered. Days 21 through 100 require a copay of roughly $200 per day. After day 100, Medicare pays nothing.

What Medicare does not cover is custodial care — help with what are called Activities of Daily Living: bathing, dressing, eating, toileting, moving around. This is the care most people actually need as they age. And Medicare doesn’t pay for it.

The distinction matters. If you need a nurse to change a wound dressing after surgery, that’s skilled nursing — Medicare covers it, temporarily. If you need someone to help you get out of bed and make breakfast because you can’t do it yourself anymore, that’s custodial care — Medicare doesn’t cover it at all.

This gap is what bankrupts families.

Who Needs Long-Term Care?

The statistics are sobering. Someone turning 65 today has roughly a 70% chance of needing some form of long-term care in their remaining years. The average nursing home stay is two and a half to three years.

Averages hide extremes.

My mother lived 20 years with Parkinson’s — not the 10 the doctors predicted. Some people need a few months of rehab and go home. Others need a decade of daily assistance.

What triggers the need for long-term care? Dementia and Alzheimer’s are the leading causes. Stroke. Parkinson’s. Falls leading to hip fractures. Heart disease. Or simply the general frailty that comes with advanced age.

This isn’t just about nursing homes. It’s about needing help with daily life — and that help is expensive whether it happens at home, in assisted living, or in a nursing facility.

The LTC Insurance Question

Should you buy long-term care insurance? It depends on what you have — and what you’re trying to protect.

Here’s a rough framework — and I want to be honest that even the sweet spot is expensive, which is part of why people procrastinate.

If your liquid, investable assets are $3 million or more, you can probably self-insure. You have the resources to absorb a $400,000 to $500,000 event without derailing your retirement or leaving your spouse with nothing.

If your liquid assets are between $1 million and $3 million, insurance likely makes sense. You have assets worth protecting, but not enough to easily absorb a major long-term care event. This is the range where the math most clearly favors coverage — and where the premiums, while real, are still manageable relative to what you’re protecting.

A note on home equity: if a significant portion of your net worth is in your house, that changes the calculation. Equity doesn’t pay for care without selling or borrowing against the property. A couple in their late 50s with a paid-down home worth $700,000 and $400,000 in retirement savings may look like they’re approaching the self-insure threshold on paper — but they’re not. The home can’t write a check to a nursing facility. If most of your wealth is illiquid, that’s actually a stronger argument for insurance, not a reason to conclude you don’t need it.

If your liquid assets are under $500,000, your focus should probably be on Medicaid planning rather than LTC insurance. The premiums may not be the best use of limited resources, and Medicaid will ultimately be the backstop.

The premium reality varies by insurer, health status, and benefit structure, but here are typical ranges. For a policy with a three-year benefit period and a $180 per day benefit, buying in your 50s might cost $2,400 per year for a base policy, or $3,900 with a 3% inflation rider. Buying in your 60s: $4,500 base, $7,000 with inflation protection. Buying in your 70s: $8,500 base, $12,000 with inflation protection.

Over a lifetime, that’s roughly $84,000 to $136,000 in total premiums if you buy in your 50s. $112,000 to $175,000 if you buy in your 60s.

What do you get for that? A base benefit of $200,000 to $225,000 over the three-year cap. With an inflation rider, that grows to $400,000 to $500,000 by the time you’re in your 80s.

The question to ask yourself: if there’s a $300,000 to $500,000 health event in my future, how am I handling it?

Timing matters. Buy too late and you may not qualify — there’s health screening involved. Buy too early and you pay premiums for decades before you might need the coverage. The sweet spot is typically mid-50s to early 60s, while you’re still healthy enough to qualify.

One warning: premiums can increase after you buy. This has happened across the industry over the past two decades. Budget for potential increases.

The Planning Conversation

If you have aging parents, there are questions worth asking. Do they have any long-term care insurance? What does their policy actually cover? Many people don’t know the details of their own coverage until they need it — and by then it’s too late to change anything. Have they thought about what happens if they can’t live independently? Do they have a relationship with an elder law attorney?

If you’re in your 50s or 60s thinking about yourself, the questions are similar but more urgent. If I need care for three to five years, how does that get paid for? Would my spouse be financially secure if I depleted our savings on my care? Am I healthy enough to qualify for LTC insurance now? What’s my plan if I wait and become uninsurable?

What Most People Get Wrong

Before the list — the most common thing people get wrong isn’t a calculation mistake. It’s reading an article like this one, nodding along, and then not doing anything. The reason usually isn’t confusion. It’s that nothing bad has happened yet, the premiums feel like a real cost today for a theoretical benefit decades away, and the whole topic is uncomfortable enough that it’s easy to set aside. That’s understandable. It’s also exactly how families end up making catastrophic decisions under pressure — because the planning window closed while they were still getting around to it.

The first mistake is assuming Medicare covers it. It doesn’t. This is the most expensive misconception in retirement planning.

The second mistake is assuming they’ll never need it. The odds say otherwise. Seven out of ten people turning 65 will need some form of long-term care.

The third mistake is assuming family will handle it. Even when family wants to help, the physical, emotional, and logistical demands are overwhelming. When we were caring for my mother, we needed 24-hour coverage. Medicaid awarded 16 hours of home care. Even paying premium rates, we couldn’t reliably find caregivers to fill the gap. The agency said they had an award but couldn’t fill positions — that was on us. My mother’s siblings filled emergency shifts. It wasn’t sustainable.

This isn’t just a financial decision. It becomes a family decision — who provides care, who pays, and how long it’s sustainable.

The fourth mistake is waiting too long to plan. By the time you need long-term care, you can’t buy insurance for it. The planning has to happen years or decades earlier.

The fifth mistake is not understanding what good nursing homes require. The best facilities have waitlists. When my mother needed placement, the first option was whoever had an open bed — not where anyone would want their parent. It took five weeks to find a better place. Planning ahead means having options.

The Bottom Line

This isn’t a fun topic. Nobody wants to think about needing help to get dressed, or eat, or go to the bathroom. But the costs are real, and they can destroy decades of careful saving in just a few years.

The question isn’t whether this happens. It’s whether you’re prepared when it does.

This week, ask yourself one question: if I needed $300,000 of care over the next five years, where would it come from? If you can’t self-insure, at least consider LTC insurance — but look at it and the costs carefully. For the majority of people, the answer for chronic health issues will be Medicaid, which I talk more about in the next two articles.

Share

We haven’t been through the college send-off yet, but we’re starting to think about the search with Ben, who’s 15. Finn is 11. So this is on my mind — not as something we’ve completed, but as something we’re actively preparing for.

Sending a kid to college is emotional. It’s also logistically complex. There’s a lot of financial stuff that needs to happen in the next 6-8 weeks, and most parents are figuring it out as they go.

This isn’t hard. It just needs to happen on time.

Most parents fall into what I call the College Timeline Trap — they don’t realize that timing matters more than difficulty. The tasks themselves are straightforward. Missing the deadlines is what costs you.

1. FAFSA for Next Year — File Early

You just finished the FAFSA nightmare for this year. But if your kid is going to need financial aid next year — and the year after, and the year after that — you need to file again. And the timeline is earlier than you might think.

The 2026-2027 FAFSA opened in late September 2025, ahead of the typical October 1 launch. Going forward, expect FAFSA to open around October 1 each year.

The federal deadline is technically June 30, 2027, but that’s misleading. Many states and colleges have priority deadlines in November, December, or early spring. If you wait until spring, you may miss out on aid that’s already been allocated. State and federal financial aid is often distributed on a first-come, first-served basis.

Put “File FAFSA” on your October calendar. Have your prior-year tax return ready. Don’t wait.

2. 529 Withdrawals — How to Actually Get the Money Out

You’ve been saving in a 529. Now you need to use it. This is where people make expensive mistakes.

What counts as a qualified expense: tuition and fees, books and supplies required for enrollment, room and board if enrolled at least half-time (up to the school’s published cost of attendance), computers and software and internet access if used primarily for school, and equipment required for coursework.

What does not count: transportation and travel costs, health insurance in most cases, college application or testing fees, extracurricular activity fees, and room and board if enrolled less than half-time.

The timing matters. Withdrawals need to happen in the same calendar year as the expense. You can either pay the school directly from the 529, or reimburse yourself after paying. If you reimburse yourself, keep documentation that the expense was qualified.

The penalty for mistakes: if you withdraw for non-qualified expenses, you pay income tax plus a 10% penalty on the earnings portion. That’s why keeping receipts matters.

A note on ownership, because this trips people up. Parent-owned 529s reduce aid eligibility by a maximum of 5.64% of the asset value. Student-owned 529s are assessed at a higher 20% rate. Grandparent-owned 529s are not reported on the FAFSA, and distributions from grandparent-owned 529s no longer count as student income under current rules.

If a grandparent has been saving for your kid, this is good news — but make sure you understand who owns what.

3. Health Insurance — Do They Stay on Your Plan?

Under the ACA, your child can stay on your health insurance until age 26, whether or not they’re in school, whether or not they’re married, whether or not they live with you.

Roughly 59% of college students aged 18-22 are covered by a parent’s health insurance plan. Students covered under a parent’s plan consistently report better coverage quality and lower out-of-pocket costs than those on other plan types.

But there are situations where student health insurance makes sense. Your child is going to school far away and your insurance network is local. The campus health center isn’t in-network for your family plan. Your plan has high deductibles and the student plan is more comprehensive for campus-based care. Your employer charges extra for dependents and the math doesn’t work.

School plans frequently cost $700 to $1,400 per year, but they may restrict care to campus or local providers and offer limited out-of-area coverage for students who go home for summers and breaks.

The common mistake: enrolling in a school student health plan without comparing the cost and coverage against staying on a parent’s plan. Price shouldn’t be the only consideration — but neither should convenience. Look at what your child actually needs.

Check whether your insurance network covers providers near the school. Compare the cost of keeping them on your plan versus the student health insurance option.

4. Credit Cards — Should You Add Them?

Some parents add their college student as an authorized user on a credit card to help them build credit. This can work well — or it can be a disaster. It depends on the kid.

The upside: your payment history helps build their credit score. They have a card for emergencies. It can be helpful for them to build credit history early.

The downside: you’re responsible for their charges. If they overspend, you pay. If you miss a payment, their credit suffers too. And there’s no automatic monitoring of what they’re spending.

An alternative: have them get their own student credit card with a low limit, maybe $500 to $1,000. They build their own credit history and learn to manage it themselves. The downside is that student cards often have higher interest rates.

The real risk: I know someone who had their first bankruptcy right out of college because they got card after card. They couldn’t manage the credit and it snowballed.

Decide your approach and have the conversation about expectations before they leave.

5. Private Student Loans — Don’t Cosign If You Can Avoid It

Federal student loans don’t require a cosigner. They have borrower protections, income-driven repayment options, and potential forgiveness programs.

Private student loans often require a parent cosigner — and that cosigner is fully responsible if the student doesn’t pay. This can affect your credit, your debt-to-income ratio, and your ability to borrow for other things.

I’ve talked many friends out of cosigning private loans. Almost all of them who didn’t listen regretted it. I know one person who cosigned for a friend who was recently out of college. During college, that friend had not managed their money well. They got into a lot of debt, couldn’t qualify for a loan, and needed one for a car. My friend signed. And... yada yada yada. They ended up losing the friendship and co-owning the debt when the friend stopped paying.

If your student has maxed out federal loans and still needs more, consider whether the school is affordable before you cosign private debt.

If private loans are on the table, understand exactly what you’re signing up for. Consider whether a different school or different plan might make more sense.

6. The Money Conversation

Before your kid leaves, have an explicit conversation about money.

How much are you providing? Monthly? Per semester? For what? What are they responsible for — books, food, fun? What’s the plan if they run out of money? Are they expected to work during school?

A conversation about money is critical. I think it starts before college — about debt, about savings, about making tradeoffs.

Ambiguity leads to conflict. Clarity leads to better outcomes.

Have the conversation. Write down what you agree to. Refer back to it when questions come up.

What Most People Get Wrong

The first mistake is waiting too long on FAFSA. The early deadlines matter for aid allocation. First-come, first-served is real.

The second mistake is withdrawing 529 money incorrectly. Taking money for non-qualified expenses triggers penalties you didn’t need to pay. Not understanding who owns the 529 can affect financial aid.

The third mistake is assuming their insurance “just works” at school. Network coverage matters, especially if the school is in a different state.

The fourth mistake is cosigning private loans without understanding the risk. You’re on the hook until it’s paid off — and refinancing to remove a cosigner is hard.

The fifth mistake is avoiding the money conversation. Kids who don’t know the budget can’t manage to it.

The Bottom Line

Sending a kid to college is a big transition — for them and for you. The financial logistics can feel overwhelming, but they’re manageable if you break them into pieces.

This week, log into your 529 and make sure you know how to withdraw the money. By August, you’ll have the financial side handled and can focus on the emotional part: watching your kid start a new chapter.

Karen and I enjoy vacations. I think my philosophy underlines something important: you should spend on vacations if that’s what you enjoy — and if you’re staying within your limits.

This doesn’t mean everyone needs a spectacular vacation every year even if they don’t have the money. It means: I like a really good vacation, therefore I’m not going to spend in other areas to make it happen. You shouldn’t feel guilty about a vacation. You just need to compensate for it.

I can’t remember a time I’ve regretted spending on travel, because we always keep it within budget, whatever that might be. Sometimes that means making choices about what we’re not going to do. But there are never regrets, because you focus on the things that are most important about the experience, not what might be tangential.

Summer is here. Everyone’s posting vacation photos. You want to take your family somewhere. But you also have credit card debt, or your emergency fund is thin, or you’re just not sure if this is a good idea.

The question isn’t “can I make the minimum payment on a vacation.” It’s “Can

I actually afford this without going backward financially?” Those are two very different questions.

Two Different Questions

Question one: “Can I make the minimum payment?”

This is what your brain asks when you’re looking at a credit card limit. If the trip costs $3,000 and your credit limit is $10,000, you can technically put it on the card. You can make the minimum payment of $60-90 per month. So you can afford it, right?

Question two: “Can I actually afford this?”

This is the real question. Can you pay for this without going into debt — or if you do put it on a card, can you pay it off within one to two months? If the answer is no, you’re not paying for a vacation. You’re financing one.

The True Cost of Financing a Vacation

Let’s do the math that nobody wants to do.

A $3,000 vacation on a credit card at roughly 22% APR — which is approximately the current average rate.

If you make minimum payments, typically 2% of the balance or $25, whichever is higher: it takes about 10 years to pay off. You pay roughly $4,200 in total, with over $1,200 going to interest. That $3,000 trip actually cost you over $4,000.

If you pay $150 per month: it takes about 2 years to pay off. You pay roughly $3,350 in total, with about $350 in interest. Still more than you planned, but much better.

If you pay $300 per month: it takes about 11 months to pay off. You pay roughly $3,175 in total, with about $175 in interest. Getting closer to the actual cost.

The point: if you can’t realistically pay it off within a few months, you’re paying a premium for the vacation. And that premium is money you could spend on something else — including your next vacation.

Subscribe now

The Affordability Test

Before you book, run three tests.

The cash test: could you pay for this in cash, or from your checking and savings, without depleting your emergency fund below one month of expenses? If yes, you can afford it. If no, you’re financing it, and you should know the true cost.

The payoff test: if you put it on a card, can you realistically pay it off within 60-90 days based on your current budget? If yes, go ahead, earn the points, pay it off. If no, you’re financing it.

The trade-off test: is the trade-off clear and answered? In other words, are you saying “we’re going to have the big vacation now” while actually knowing how it’s going to come out — or are you leaving that question unanswered and hoping it works out later?

Being sure on what you’re trading off means you know it’s something you can live with.

When It Is Okay to Spend Money on Experiences

I’m not going to tell you never to take a vacation. Life is short. Experiences matter. There are times when spending money on a trip makes sense.

You have a solid financial foundation. Emergency fund in place. Retirement contributions on track. No high-interest debt, or a clear payoff plan. In this case, spending on experiences is part of enjoying the life you’re building.

It’s a milestone moment. Your kid’s last summer before college. A big anniversary. A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Some experiences have a time limit.

You’re booking within your means. A $1,500 trip you can pay off in 60 days is very different from a $5,000 trip you’ll be paying off for 3 years.

You’ve compensated for it. If you’re cutting spending in other areas to make this happen, you’ve already done the work. That’s conscious decision-making — like someone I know who anticipated a bonus and put part of the vacation on a card for 30 days because the money would come in, just not in time for the trip. They accepted a small interest cost and paid it off. That’s a sensible trade-off.

The Permission to Enjoy

It’s okay to have a great vacation — even the kind you see on social media. The question is: is it actually once-in-a-lifetime, and are you shifting resources around accordingly?

It’s not about feeling guilty. It’s about making honest decisions about what’s most important to you.

And sometimes life happens. You take the vacation, and then something unexpected comes up — a funeral, a medical bill, a car repair. That expense wasn’t in the plan. It’s not worth regretting the vacation because of it.

I want you to leave this feeling empowered to make choices, not shamed. You can have the vacation — but then you need to cut something else.

Alternatives to the Trip You Can’t Afford

If the math doesn’t work for the vacation you’re dreaming of, you have options.

Scale it down. Can you do a shorter trip? A closer destination? A different time of year when it’s cheaper?

Delay and save. Start putting $200 per month into a vacation fund now. By next summer, you’ll have $2,400 saved and can take the trip without debt.

Do something different. A local staycation or day trips can create memories without the price tag. This isn’t as exciting, but it also doesn’t come with 3 years of payments.

What Most People Get Wrong

The first mistake is confusing “I can make the payment” with “I can afford it.” These are not the same thing.

The second mistake is ignoring the interest. That vacation costs what it costs plus whatever interest you pay. If you’re paying 22% APR for 2 years, add 25% or more to the sticker price.

The third mistake is leaving the trade-off unanswered. Saying “we’ll pay for it later” without knowing how it actually comes out.

The fourth mistake is not planning ahead. If you want to travel next summer, start saving now. The best vacations are the ones you don’t have to pay off afterward.

The Bottom Line

I’m not here to tell you not to take a vacation. I’m here to help you figure out if this particular vacation makes sense for your financial situation right now.

Before you book anything, run the cash test. Do the math. Be honest with yourself. And if the numbers don’t work, that’s okay — start saving now, and next year’s trip will be even better because you’ll know you can actually afford it.

That experience shaped how I think about money. Credit lines can disappear. Relationships can change. But cash in hand when you need it is what matters most.

If you’re in your 40s or 50s and you’ve never built an emergency fund — or you have “some savings” but aren’t sure if it’s enough — this post is for you. And if you feel like you’re too far behind to start now, I have some research that might change your mind.

The Number That Surprised Me

Research from Vanguard and others suggests something counterintuitive: having even a modest emergency fund is one of the strongest predictors of financial well-being — often more impactful than income or total assets.

Why? Because most unexpected expenses fall in the $1,000–$2,000 range. Having that amount on hand means you can handle most financial shocks without borrowing, without raiding retirement accounts, and without the spiral of stress that follows.

There’s another finding worth mentioning: people with emergency savings report spending significantly less time worrying about money. The mental load is lighter. The low-grade anxiety that follows you everywhere — the background hum of “what if something happens” — gets quieter.

And the benefits extend beyond peace of mind. Financial stress is strongly linked to reduced focus at work. People without emergency savings contribute less to their 401(k)s and take more early withdrawals. The emergency fund isn’t just protecting you from emergencies — it’s protecting your retirement savings too.

You Probably Have More Than You Think

Here’s what most people miss: the question isn’t just “how much cash do I have in a savings account?” It’s: what could I access within two weeks, without major penalties, without derailing my other goals, and without significant tax consequences?

That includes high-yield savings accounts (the obvious answer), money market accounts, and — this surprises people — your Roth IRA contributions. You can withdraw what you contributed to a Roth IRA at any time, tax-free and penalty-free. Not the earnings, just the contributions. If you’ve put $30,000 into a Roth over the years, that’s $30,000 in emergency reserves you may not have been counting.

What probably shouldn’t count: stocks in a brokerage account (if you lose your job because the economy is down, your stocks are probably down too), CDs with early withdrawal penalties (defeats the purpose), or a home equity line of credit (you’re putting your house at risk).

The principle is simple: liquidity plus stability equals emergency fund. If you can get to it fast and it won’t have lost value when you need it, it counts.

Share

The Tiered Approach

Instead of one overwhelming number, think of emergency savings in tiers.

The first tier is $1,000. This handles the most common emergencies — car repairs, home repairs, medical copays. A broken water heater. An unexpected trip to the mechanic. Among people who’ve had a $1,000+ financial emergency in the past six months, the most common causes were car repairs, home repairs, and medical bills. A thousand dollars handles a lot.

Even $20 per week gets you to $1,000 in a year.

The second tier is $1,500. This covers the typical unexpected expense and gives you breathing room beyond the bare minimum. It’s the point where most single emergencies stop being crises.

The third tier is one month of essential expenses. Not your full monthly spending — just the essentials: housing, utilities, food, transportation, minimum debt payments. If your essential expenses are $4,000 per month, that’s your target.

The fourth tier is three months of essential expenses. This is the traditional “emergency fund” — enough to cover a job loss or extended medical issue while you figure out next steps.

The fifth tier is six months of essential expenses. If your job is unstable, your industry is volatile, or you’re the sole earner, this is worth building toward.

Don’t skip tier one because tier five feels impossible. Each tier reduces stress. Each tier buys you time. Each tier is a win.

Why This Is Different at 50

In your 40s and 50s, you’re often squeezed from every direction. Mortgage payments. Kids who may still need help. Aging parents who may need support. Trying to catch up on retirement savings. There’s less margin for error — and mistakes are more expensive when recovery time is shorter.

You also have more realistic awareness of what can go wrong. At 30, job loss feels abstract. At 50, you’ve probably seen it happen to peers. Medical issues become more common. You know that life doesn’t always go according to plan.

And job searches take longer. Older workers tend to experience longer periods of unemployment — often significantly longer than younger workers. A six-month emergency fund at 30 might be conservative. At 55, it might be barely adequate.

Where to Keep It

A high-yield savings account is the obvious choice. Many are currently paying around 4–5% APY, they’re liquid, FDIC-insured, and have no penalties. Money market accounts work too, sometimes with check-writing privileges.

I-bonds are good for longer-term emergency reserves, but there’s a one-year lockup period — not ideal for your first $1,500.

A Roth IRA is an underrated option. If you’re building toward retirement anyway, your Roth contributions can serve double duty as your emergency backstop. You can always withdraw what you put in.

What to avoid: keeping large emergency funds in regular checking accounts (too easy to spend, earns nothing) or invested in stocks (too volatile when you need stability most).

What People Get Wrong

The first mistake is ignoring it because the big number feels impossible. The $1,000 milestone matters. The $1,500 milestone matters even more. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

The second mistake is keeping it in checking. It earns nothing. It’s too easy to spend. Move it somewhere that pays interest and requires an extra step to access.

The third mistake is not counting your accessible assets. You may have more liquidity than you think. A Roth IRA with $15,000 in contributions is $15,000 in emergency reserves.

The fourth mistake is losing track of what you have. If you have old 401(k)s or accounts scattered around, make sure beneficiaries are updated and you know how to access them. Old accounts can become invisible — and that’s a nightmare for whoever has to find them later.

The fifth mistake is touching it for non-emergencies. Define what counts as an emergency before you need it. A vacation is not an emergency. A sale is not an emergency. A broken furnace in January is an emergency.

If You’ve Had to Raid It

If you’ve already dipped into your emergency fund — or never had one to begin with — here’s the priority order for building or rebuilding:

First, emergency fund. Even a small buffer prevents the next shock from cascading into something worse.

Second, get the employer 401(k) match. Don’t leave free money on the table.

Third, pay down high-interest debt — anything above 10–15% interest.

Fourth, additional retirement contributions — after the emergency fund is stable.

The Real Point

You can do this.

Start with $1,000. Then $1,500. Then one month of essential expenses. Each milestone reduces your stress and increases your security.

You don’t have to solve this in two weeks. What matters is that you start building — and that you don’t stop. Every amount you save, no matter the size, is reduced risk for you and your family.

In midlife, you’ve seen enough of life to know that things go wrong. The question isn’t whether something will happen — it’s whether you’ll have options when it does.

This week, move $100 into a separate savings account. That’s how this starts.

Subscribe now

I’ve found most people buy insurance reactively—a friend dies and suddenly they want life insurance, they buy a house and get homeowners insurance, their employer offers benefits and they check a box. Then they never think about it again.

The result is a patchwork of policies that don’t fit together. Overinsured on some things, dangerously underinsured on others. Paying for coverage they don’t need while leaving real gaps that could devastate their family.

This post is the wake-up call. Not to sell you anything—I don’t sell insurance—but to get you to actually open your policies and ask: do I have what I need? And this is just a landscape- my plan is to go more deeply into each of the plans in future posts.

The fix is simple but uncomfortable

At least once a year—ideally during open enrollment or when something changes (new job, new house, new kid)—actually look at what you have. Ask three questions: What does this cover? What doesn’t it cover? Is it enough?

Life insurance

Who needs it: anyone whose death would create a financial burden for someone else. If you have a spouse, kids, or anyone who depends on your income, you need life insurance.

How much: a common rule of thumb is 10-12x your annual income, but what really matters is what your family would need to maintain their life without you—mortgage, living expenses, childcare, education costs.

What type: for most people, term life insurance is the answer. You buy coverage for a set period (20-30 years), and if you die during that period, your beneficiaries get the payout. Straightforward and affordable.

Whole life insurance is more complicated. It combines insurance with a savings/investment component, which sounds appealing. But premiums are much higher, the “investment” often underperforms simpler alternatives after fees and commissions, and it’s easy to buy more than you need. Insurance agents love to sell whole life because many times the commissions are higher. For most people, you’re better off buying term and investing the difference yourself.

Whole life coverage can also let you down when you need it. A couple of years ago I was talking with a widow. She and her husband thought they were covered if he passed away. However, she discovered the whole life policy was worth far less than they’d both assumed. At the edge of retirement she thought the policy would bring her over the finish line, instead she had to keep working years longer than they’d planned.

Even if your kids are grown, you still need enough to cover final expenses. The average funeral runs $8,000 to $12,000. If you don’t have at least that much in coverage or savings earmarked for it, you’re leaving your family with a burden, not a gift.

What to check: Do you know whether your policy is term or whole? What’s the death benefit? When does it expire? If you can’t answer these, open the policy.

Disability insurance

Who needs it: anyone who earns income. Your ability to work is your most valuable asset, especially in your 40s and 50s.

This is the most underappreciated coverage. People assume Social Security disability will cover them—the average SSDI payment in 2026 is about $1,630 per month. Try living on that. They assume their employer’s disability insurance is enough without knowing what it actually pays or how it’s taxed.

What most people don’t realize: employer-provided disability is often 60% of your salary, but if your employer pays the premiums pre-tax, that means the benefits are taxable. So that 60% becomes more like 40-45% after taxes. Most employer plans also have caps—if you’re a higher earner, you may only be covered for a fraction of your income. And if you leave your job or go self-employed, you lose coverage entirely.

After my divorce, I took a job with a small consultancy. I didn’t think to ask about disability coverage. In the past I always worked for large firms and just “assumed” it was there. A friend pointed out the gap. Result - I panicked and bought a mediocre policy because I didn’t know better.

What to check: What percentage does your employer plan pay? Are benefits taxable? Is there a cap? Calculate what you’d actually receive after taxes—if it doesn’t cover essentials, consider supplemental coverage.

Homeowners and renters insurance

Who needs it: anyone who owns a home or rents and has belongings worth protecting.

The problem: people tend to be overinsured on some perils (like fire) and dangerously underinsured on others (like flooding or hurricane damage). Standard homeowners policies often exclude flood—you need a separate policy.

What to check: Does your policy cover replacement cost or actual cash value? (Replacement cost is better.) What’s excluded—flood, earthquake, wind? Is your coverage enough to actually rebuild at today’s construction costs?

A note on claims: think carefully before filing small claims. I know someone in a storm-prone state who filed several claims for damage just above the deductible. The company dropped them, and they had a hard time finding new coverage. Sometimes it’s better to pay out of pocket and save your insurance relationship for catastrophic stuff. But I’ve also regretted not going through insurance on small fender-benders when complications arose later. No perfect answer—just think it through.

Auto insurance

Who needs it: anyone who drives.

What most people miss: liability limits. The minimum required by your state is almost certainly not enough. If you cause an accident and damages exceed your liability coverage, you’re personally on the hook. That can mean losing savings, your home, or future earnings.

What to do: increase your liability limits. The cost difference between minimum coverage and $100K/$300K or higher is often surprisingly small.

Umbrella insurance

What it is: extra liability coverage that kicks in when your homeowners or auto limits are exhausted.

Who needs it: anyone with significant assets to protect. If you own a home, have retirement savings, or could have wages garnished in a lawsuit, you have something to lose.

The math: a $1 million umbrella policy typically costs $150-$350 per year, with each additional million adding about $75-$150. That’s remarkably cheap protection against a catastrophic lawsuit.

What to check: Do you have umbrella coverage at all? Does it require underlying liability limits you don’t currently carry? (Most policies require minimum auto and home liability limits before they’ll cover you.)

For people with real assets, this makes sense. For the typical family still building their foundation, it’s worth considering but not the first priority.

Long-term care insurance

What it is: coverage for extended care—nursing homes, assisted living, home health aides—when you can no longer take care of yourself.

The reality: someone turning 65 today has about a 70% chance of needing some form of long-term care. The nationwide average annual cost for a semi-private nursing home room now exceeds $110,000—and runs much higher in expensive states.

The challenge: long-term care insurance is expensive and has gotten more so. Premiums can increase after you buy. And if you wait too long, you may not qualify due to health issues.

Options include traditional long-term care insurance, hybrid policies combining life insurance with LTC benefits, self-insuring if you have enough assets, and Medicaid planning using irrevocable trusts (complicated and not a simple flip of a switch).

When to think about it: your 50s and early 60s, while you’re still healthy enough to qualify.

Lesson learned - my father had a good long-term care policy in the mid-90s, but switched to a cheaper one that only covered short-term rehabilitative care—90 days max. When my mother’s Parkinson’s diagnosis came, that policy was useless. She lived 20 years with the disease, not the 10 the doctors predicted. The costs of miscalculating were enormous.

We’ll go deeper on long-term care in a future post. For now: start thinking about it.

What most people get wrong

Assuming employer coverage is enough. It often isn’t—especially for disability and life. Know the details, do the math, supplement if needed.

Setting and forgetting. Your needs change when income changes, when you have kids, when you buy a house, when kids leave. Review annually.

Not understanding tax treatment. If your employer pays disability premiums pre-tax, benefits are taxed. That 60% replacement becomes a lot less.

Buying insurance as an investment. Insurance is for protection. If someone is selling you on “cash value” or “returns,” be skeptical. Buy insurance for insurance. Invest separately.

Not knowing when to file a claim. Small claims can raise rates or get you dropped. Sometimes better to pay out of pocket—but not always.

A note on business insurance

If you have a side business or home-based business, your homeowners policy probably doesn’t cover business activities. Your umbrella probably doesn’t either. Business liability is separate. Don’t assume you’re covered—check, and if you’re running a real business, get proper business insurance.

The bottom line

Insurance isn’t exciting. But it protects you from the things that could derail your financial life—death, disability, lawsuits, catastrophic loss.

The problem isn’t that you don’t have insurance. It’s that you probably haven’t looked closely enough to know if what you have is what you need.

Open your policies. Read them. Do the math. Close the gaps.

This is general guidance, not legal or financial advice. Rules and coverage vary by state and policy.

You might also like:

• “The Estate Plan You Need Today” — life insurance proceeds and beneficiary designations

• “Do you Actually Need a Trust” - Yes, you do!